Monday, April 16, 2018

Life vs The Culture of Death

The entire purpose for mankind existing is to inhabit a body and learn from the life exercise. Even secular humanists believe this. Religious people view earthly life as a qualifying round for eternal afterlife.  Secularists believe this earthly life is all there is. No afterlife exists in their ideology. When a human's earthly life is the totality of existence, the motivation to maximize its value becomes A Priori - literally. Secularists obsess to acquire as many comforts, meaningful material possessions, and power, as their short lives, and effort, permit.

Christianity's eternity is a very long time. Long enough to render this speck of time that defines earthly life properly. The opportunities resident in the afterlife are predicated by the choices made and behaviors displayed while living an earthly existence.  Your author attempts to avoid interpreting the Lord's motivations and compliance standards, but, scriptures infer some choices made while on earth appear to compromise the soul eternally.  Murder is one act that may rise to that hellish standard.

Conversely, life holds subjective value in the secular ideology. In fact, devaluing human life is a necessary requirement for any secular, subjective, humanistic society. The ideology may not elevate one behavior or choice made over another. The circumstantial morality advocated by secular humanists provides no tempering aspect for the individual or society. The historical consequence of these preferences are obscene, ghastly and dehumanizing.

Morality, right and wrong, good and evil, are radically different concepts in a secular mind.  In the secular context, moral absolutes are stupid, irrelevant, self-defeating considerations - except when they provide the secularists a political argument to attack their opponents. When morality conflicts with instinct or temporal desire, the secularist frames them in the same equivalent and "relative" perspective he uses for other components of life. Good and evil, right and wrong, are contingent upon circumstance - and the Needs asserted in political ambitions. Needs must additionally survive secular redefinition. They are not true needs - essential items for life - needs. They are not needs, that, without which, people suffer significantly then perish. An objective assessment of secular needs reveals they are temporal desires and appetites. The objective of the redefinition is to validate the need, and sate the selfishness that inspired the Need. Moreover, secular Needs are purposely obfuscated; then combined with legitimate needs for a single purpose - to create dependence. Dependence assures allegiance - votes. Vote bribery is the true objective for all secular policies.

The dishonesty required to be an adherent of Secular Humanism is astounding. However, deceit is an ideological imperative, a political reality, readily accepted and expounded by secular adherents. Their aggregate actions compound to destroy traditional values and standards. Advancing government sponsored, special interest placating programs and protections for sacrosanct groups, are devised exclusively to addict people to government stipends and the attendant protective sanctions. A life committed to dependency is the necessary rubric of secular humanism. Equivalence enables, then mandates, selfishness?Dependence trump moral considerations. Not mandating a nominal, self-reliant, absolute behavioral standard, silently endorses ANY standard of behavior.  Not punishing violations of the standard, assures unorthodox and violent behaviors expand and go unchecked. For example - when education is considered stupid, and a waste of time; "Acting White", breeds an ignorant community of self-destructive criminality and violence that does not respect life.

The conflict between secular humanism and religion generically is historic and deadly.  The two standards are antithetical and unable to peacefully co-exist. This is acutely evident if one views the current religious conflict in America. The Progressive's willingness to eliminate opposition, using any means necessary, has always been requisite. Religion is inevitably made illegal.  Historically, every installment of secular humanism has required the murder of many people. Nearly 200 million perished worldwide in the worship of equivalence. Secular humanism is a Death Cult. They are obsessed with death because death is an instrument which must be employed with regularity and vigor to persuade dissenters and eliminate competition. People innately love personal freedoms - and those may not exist is a secular society.

A respect for life sits at the core of Christianity and most religions. All laws and standards adopted in a religious society are contingent upon that belief. When the most innocent members of a society, the truly At Risk, infants in the womb - are brutally dismembered, under the mantle of Choice (to prevent the population dependent upon the state growing too large) it reveals the depravity of the ideology used to argue for retaining the authority to murder the unborn. Democrats must, therefore, maintain an acceptable population size. One large enough to provide sufficient votes needed to win elections, while simultaneously keeping the population small enough to not overtax fiscal resources. It's a dicey problem. Only the murder of the unborn provides Democrats adequate flexibility.

Murder in the secular society is profoundly punitive and perverse. Abortion claims at least 1/3 of all black births in America. Currently, more black infants are aborted than graduate high school in America.  More - One in four urban black males die from violence before reaching age 25. Democrats obsess over, and work to ensure these population control/DEATH policies are enacted and free from modification. Opponents are attacked as racists and tried from a Zero Tolerance perspective. Both policies provides the true measure of secular humanism; its sensibilities and sensitivities. 

No comments:

Post a Comment