Friday, July 31, 2015

The End Times -Revelations & Speculation

A television show last evening did an interesting job at portraying what might occur when John's prophecies chronicled in the Book of Revelations come to pass.  The generic portrayal was better than most - as they typically mock and ridicule religion and the Second Coming event at some point. The media can't help themselves.  Why they bother is either a gratuitous effort made knowing Christians will watch, and/or they are unable to restrain their agnostic or atheistic views.  This version followed a news crew, reporter and camera man, as they followed the End Time events. This show avoided direct mocking by using one of cast members as the token atheist. The cameraman questioned the prophecy and their pair's actions until the last twenty minutes - then he acknowledges his views changed.  In all, it was a fair portrayal - if not accurate.

Many people believe, or think God and scriptures are metaphors, or a nebulous record where only the concept is legitimate.  I beg to differ.  There is no reason for the Lord to eqivocate or use general terminology to depict events that must occurs as predicted.  Prophets may misunderstand what is presented them, and that potentially may create errors. When this occurs the Lord clarifies in later prophecies. The Lord simply cannot permit inaccurate, loosely defined, generic instructions suffice for events and commandments that predicate eternal outcomes.  The Lord does not behave similarly in any other area of his responsibilities.  Straightforward, clear, unyielding order is synonymous with the operation of the universe, God's domain. His commandments are specific with no equivocation. Why, how is it possible, the Lord will allow sloppy, imprecise, metaphoric instructions and descriptions. In my view it does not. It may not happen.

The show about End Times/Revelation showed the biblical scholar (introduced at the beginning, but died) making inferences and stating much of Revelations was metaphors - Babylon would not necessarily where Armageddon will transpire. Any large metropolitan area will suffice, apparently.  The proximity to Israel, recorded in prophecy, makes any location outside the Middle East impractical and irrational.  Other comments I've heard and read suggest the Roman Empire was the source of John's rage and comparisons - "the Beast" referenced in the scripture.  Experience led me to think, many people's world view and religious preferences require this reliance upon the metaphor rubric.  They typically also embrace modern translations of scriptures - with all the inaccuracies and open to interpretation language therein.

Old language conventions used in scriptures are not easy to read.  They are often difficult to comprehend.  Scriptures are supposed to be difficult to comprehend.  One function is to expand the intellect of the reader and the topics. Scriptures are to up-lift the reader and improve them.  Using the contemporary language and slang vernacular accomplishes neither.  This perspective goes hand in hand with permitting church attendance in jeans and a T-shirt.  Both practices are disrespectful and diminish worship.  Prayer and worship in a moment of emergency, when God's input in sorely, immediately needed, condones prayer without kneeling, or voicing the prayer.  Otherwise, God commands us to adopt a worship posture described in the Big Ten Commandments.  Our relationship with God is precious and will predicate our eternal station. It is wise to not take chances and to afford it the respect and affection God asks from us.  If poverty prevents traditional Sunday Best attire, make certain the attire is properly prepared before entering the Lord's house. Your Sunday Best is an offering to the Lord - no different than a tithe/donation.

Love the Lord, and he will reward you.  He's our Dad.  He wants the best for us.  He knows our needs.  Importantly, there are limited ways we are able to interact with God. The physical dynamics of the universe predicate specific channels of communication must be used.  Otherwise, you waste your time. Prayer, like scriptures, is not metaphoric.  The verbal prayer can transcend the universe and reach God's ear, or listening device. The physics prove it is possible. Likewise, the details in scripture must conform to physical laws, otherwise, they are meaningless.  As Albert Einstein once remarked: "God does not roll dice."  He will not deceive you, or provide you misinformation when your salvation is at stake.  The adversary works using those tools.  They are antithetical to righteousness.  

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Freedom is Very Risky

Freedom ...  is a tight rope walk without a safety net.

Safety and freedom are antithetical.  Risk is the price of Freedom.  Servitude is the price of safety. 

Consider - the X-Games.  Riders originally rode skateboards without pads or helmets - they performed amazing feats of daring.  As the sport increased in popularity, the expanded exposure inevitably brought the attention of the Nannies. Nannies are Progressive in their beliefs. They are terminally unhappy busy-bodies who enjoy spreading the misery they choose as a life style.  Nannies find life’s true and real meaning bullying other people - forcing them to conform to their wants, wishes, and beliefs.  Participants were occasionally injured in the X-Games.  The Nannies took action to mandate helmets, pads, mouth guards, safety railings, track specifications, landing buffers, safety inspectors, and more, for the X-Games.  

The more dangerous the feat, the more strength and skill and sweat required, the greater the likelihood the men and boys participating acquired fame; or injury.  Fame and injury were intolerable consequence to the Nannies. Fame specifically troubled Nannies as it presented another example of males obtaining wealth and attention due to their muscles, testosterone, and fearlessness.  The Nannies convinced many mothers their children might die riding a skateboard, or a bike.  When mothers learned what they sons were doing, they panicked – abetted by the Nannies gruesome and unrelenting descriptions of the potential crippling consequences.  Their sons might also lure other boys, share equipment, or act like boys. Injuries would surely happen.  Injury may leave the family exposed to law suits and property losses.

Many children admired and tried to emulate the best skateboard riders.  They fall. They crash. They fail – often. The process of mastering the tricks performed requires they so do. Cuts, stitches, road rash, blood and bruises are the price for mastering the skateboard.  When the X-Games went prime time, many mothers freaked and demanded the Bad Example being set – no helmets, pads, etc… end.    

Concerns escalated to point where the children were increasingly unable to perform feats of daring, or have fun.  The cuts and bruises associated with childhood were one by one eliminated by laws, and law suits, that prevented children from encountering risk whatsoever.  The X-Games feats of daring are now less spectacular.  That's the outcome when Nannies interject and the danger is removed.  The same is true for freedom.  

The X-Games now suffer from a dearth of "Posers", and women.  The safety committees formed to protect participants from themselves, additionally mandated female participation. Federal laws like: Title Nine; and the Progressive’s desire to ruin the sport assured it.  The vast majority of Progressives are not athletic, nor do they tolerate risk well.  Mamby pamby sissies best describes them.  Risk to them is anathema. Pity is an emotion I hold for their poor, poor, children; whenever the child is not genetically predisposed to emulate their parents. Progressive are forbidden from playing sports (except soccer) or on playgrounds, or in any way participate in rowdy, unsupervised, exclusively male oriented activities. The X-Games participants now "Jump the Shark” more than dangerous barriers. Implementation of multi-sexual-ism is usually the first, and last, sign the "Whateveritis" activity is doomed.   

I read the X-Games made their way into the Olympics!!!  We can all be thankful for that.  Sponsorships and salaries are needed to lure the next generation of Posers into the once dangerous and intriguing sport, and pay taxes!  Remove the danger and Whateveritis becomes lame and predictable. That is a prime directive for Progressives. They hate comparisons. Brave, daring, fit, masculine boys and men, even obliquely, must be eliminated. Sweaty, strong, devil may care, men compare unfavorably to Progressive males. Comparison exposes their missing sexuality.  An obscure aspect of biology, and some cultural derivations, actually suggest, and permit, Progressive men not be classified with real males.  Certain cultures make exception for persons born with male sexual appendages that do not, in any way, behave like men.  These androgenous types are grouped in a category nearer the female persuasion.  They primarily associate with women and enjoy the interests of women more than the natural inclinations of men.  

Unfortunately, in America, there is no weakling - wussy category. That, in part, is responsible for the conflict and trouble.  American culture makes only one exception for these gender misaligned persons - Gay. The media strategically chooses to give these people a larger voice than they deserve. That's understandible because the media is chock-a-block with Progressives - they sympathize with feeling out of place. The media believes if they promote the opinions of these androgenous anomalies, society will embrace them and change to accept them.  The recent fascination with trans-sexual rights and gay marriage is proof positive of what is written here.  The problem is placating these oddities impacts freedom.  It requires indoctrination.

Our freedoms, our rights -- to do what we want, when we want, with whom we want, HOW we want, are being erased one by one. The Progressives refuse to tolerate exceptions to their chosen views. They act in a zero-tolerance manner to punish and attack views not their own - while demanding fealty to diversity, multi-culutralism, inclusion, etc... 

Our freedoms and liberties, defined in the Declaration and enumerated in the Constitution, are now given us piece meal...  one tiny bite at a time...  pre-chewed and strained… with a Heimlich specialist waiting in the wings.  What's permissible comes after a thorough review by the Consumer Protection Agency, and every other Agency of the Federal Government that can convince Congress their input is vital to the continued "Health and Welfare" of the Commerce Clause; the Titles of the Civil Rights Act; and the legions of Americans who are incapable of, or refuse to, negotiate life without assistance – and protection. 

Lately, the laws change so rapidly a person risks acting outside the bounds of the law - never knowing new laws exist.  The goal appears to create so many laws everyone will inadvertantly break one and that will assure criminal charges await anyone daring to challenge the ever evolving status quo.  "It's for our own good" - and the good of Party.  A diverse group of compliance regulators spend inordinate hours in dark, energy efficient "Green" rooms, concocting new rules, new restrictions, new prohibitions, on acts of spontaneous exuberance, and, other pursuits, once embraced as evidence of America's finest traits – male physical superiority and courage.  

Many agencies and organizations (where Progressives hold sway) purposely exclude masculine men from consideration in hiring. Masculine males will expose the shortcomings of the diversity compliant and inclusion obsessed regulators.  If their methods are challenged, esteems could suffer. Paradigms might break. Danger and the risk that inspires most of the for own good laws are essential to masculinity.  The greatest rewards flow from subduing the greatest risks and dangers – regardless of pursuit.  

Freedom is a tight rope walk without the safety net. Modern freedoms resemble the protective gear worn by participants on the Fear Factor show. No one can be harmed whatsoever - when ever.  Everyone must be safe - no matter the cost, compliance, or unexpected outcome, that flows from the Static Analysis cabal found in all government agencies and the regulations they scribe.  Egalitarianism - the bastard child of Marxism, and an unwillingness to recognize what the physical senses transmit - is ostensibly considerate, compassionate, even-handed, and "Oh So Fair".  Fairness, in all its thuggery, is raised and carried about like a truncheon in the white knuckled grip of a Progressive – akin to the National Socialist during a 1930s Munich rally; to encourage citizens to do what they were told...  and like it.  Civility is their mantra.

The word Civility is one (of many) magniloquent clubs used to brutalize an immoral people who resist what's done on their behalf – what’s good for them.  Cries for Civility ring out whenever agency regulators and Democrat politicians confront resistance, lose ground in a poll, or the fallacies in their mission statement are exposed.  Civility is a subjective code word for Shut The F--K Up.  Civility is the last dirty trick used when a person has lost the debate.  Political cries for Civility are synonymous with mercy and begging – crying UNCLE!  Progressives beg Civility littered with tears when beaten. Then, as their opponent relents, they stab them in the back.  Some people just won't learn...There is a direct correlate between word and language restrictions and losses of freedom.  What's good for citizens must be good for the nation.  What's good for the nation must be good for citizens.  What good are citizens, or a nation, who refuse what’s good for them?

Uncivil, extreme, intolerant, insensitive, radical, bigot, racist -- et al -- are the alert words shouted to draw attention to trouble makers who resist the placement of the Focus Group tested thought and communication shackles.  What to do with trouble makers is under review in various agencies charged with protecting us from thinking for ourselves.  Thinking for one’s self and questioning what is done on one’s behalf, is prima facia evidence that someone is extremely inappreciative, and likely aligned with some Extreme organization -- promoting an Extreme ideology, that regurgitates Extreme rhetoric.  Extremes, like dangers, are intolerable, intolerant, and, in toto, must be terminated.

Not everyone will overcome or avoid danger unscathed.  Unequal outcomes create disparity.  Disparity breeds inequality.  Inequality is unequaled in explicating discouraging words.  Hurt feelings and regulations are amplified when outcomes suggests that everyone is not equal in every way. The Pursuit of Happiness is like any other individually defined goal. It reflects the individual's needs and desires.  So long as the individual cannot monopolize a something, or directly impugn another's "Pursuit", the Pursuit ought not to be impeded -whatsoever. Pursuing Happiness is a sacred, God given, Right, set forth in the Declaration of Independence.  All Pursuits traverse the environment and confront a finite set of resources and opportunities.  That is life on Earth.  Shortages will occur as Pursuits are exercised.  The shortage reality is not grounds for regulating away Pursuits, but that is what Progressives sought to do when the members of the various splinter groups that define their base whined - it was unfair, others did more, had more, created more, than they had.  The fairness bureaucracy leapt into action. 

The Progressive Democrats first acted to contort Pursuits of Happiness into the crime of "offense".  Offense is a Neo-criminal charge that grew out of a fairness petri dish; when policy wonks couldn't find precedence in the 14th amendment, the Commerce Clause, the Civil Rights Titles, or the Whole Cloth Warehouse - where most Progressive remedies are woven. Once the crime of Offense is established, government remedies follow. 

The offense remedies are enforced by a group of DOJ employees carrying newly minted Guidelines and Best Practices in one hand, and a Summons listing defendants in the other.  Keeping lawyers employed is A Priori in Progressive policy development. Increasing the size and scope and reach of government is augmented by Progressive Justices.  Progressive Justices are provided special reading glasses by the Harvard and Yale law schools.  The glasses enable them to read between the lines, and see the margin edits written in invisible ink.  As the Justices rule, they create legal precedence and reflexively mandate even more laws and restrictions.  "Legislation form the Bench" permits elected politicians to avoid performing the duties of their office (and any negative press that might arise had they voted on Whateveritis.)  

Civil and Civility complaints morph into criminal offense law, stiff mandatory sentencing; and outrageous awards to the aggrieved/offended party.  That sends a message...  step out of line, or resist, or offend a protected class, and the government will confiscate your property and freedoms. The offense of Pursuing Happiness - unless everyone is equally wealthy, equally satisfied, equally equal, simultaneously offends fairness and justice. 

However, if you join the Party and do as you're told, or, if you are born into a sanctioned group where skin color is the criterion for consideration, or, if you practice an accredited sexual deviation; you May advance (sans merit) and acquire protection, and occasionally great wealth.  Great wealth is available if you will claim your fellowman offended you, made you sad, or caused you to question yourself, doubt your behaviors.  Who needs freedom when a few dollars are available for dishonest, birth-right or behavioral beneficence perks -- and the Government's/Party's power expands. 

Entire divisions of humanity are addicted to government handouts -- some more than others.  But all the addicted share a similar trait -- they value spending power and status above all else.  Trading unexercised liberties for a stipend increase (that elevates a perceived status) is an accommodation made for the promise of a vote.  Indolence addicts value status and money more than their freedoms.  They don't care that a fellow citizen's wealth and freedoms are sacrificed on a secular altar their behalf - morality is for suckers.

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Dissecting Infants for Profit - Planned Parenthood's Obscenity

This blog holds an unusual view of the process and moment the soul enters the body.  The soul is not the same energy as the the human life force - Freud's ID.  The two energies are not mutually synonymous. They are separate energies with distinct functions. Most do not think of the soul in physical terms.  The majority believe the soul is a metaphysical, super-natural entity.  It is not.  It has mass and serves a specific temporal and eternal functions.  Comparing a lower order life form helps comprehend the differences between life and the consciousness/soul.  Lower life forms have no obtuse, complex reasoning.  They don't contemplate.  They respond to stimuli and operate on a primitive instincts.  The mentally diminished reveals a much lower cognition function too.  Their physical bodies operate perfectly - save the diminished reasoning. Additionally, if the soul and life force were the same energy, repentance becomes physically impossible. This phenomena also explains why no one has memory of the womb.  What separates the rational man from the lower life forms is his use of reason..., and the use of utensils ;)

The distinction of duties for the soul and life energy in no way diminishes the value of life.  As noted above, the organism lives. The organism feels pain. When the unborn child is literally dissected, in situ, that procedure is no different than what the Japanese and Germans did in the concentration camps during WW ll. Dr. Menkele was famous for similar experiments. Live dissection with no anesthesia is inhumane, ghastly and literally unconscionable. This practice is evidence of a depravity that knows no compassion. Selling the bodies parts, carved away from living infants, is a chosen behavior I have no word to describe.  Evil comes close, but evil does not accurately define the cruelty and absence of basic human empathy.  Even animals hold a higher sense of compassion.  The cretins performing the acts, then clarify their emotional incontinence by arguing about the money they stand to gain from brokering body parts - dissected from live infants!

Progressive are more than willing to suffer collateral damage (except during war) to achieve a political end.  No limit exists for them.  Only detrimental political circumstances and personal loss precludes their acting.  They will attempt to rationalize any behavior.  They will commit crimes, or knowingly suffer crimes be committed - including murder, to achieve a political objective.

For example, take the Batman shooter. He was ostensibly under the care of a psychological "Professional".  He was a sick Young man that displayed the very behaviors and thinking that would result in a catastrophe where others were hurt.  He needed supervision, or placed where he did no harm to himself or others.  From my perspective, it appears the professional did nothing because a shooting might provide Progressives an incidence and argument for gun control.

In another instance, the Progressive Left were more than tolerant of thousands of Mexican national deaths.  They actively pursued the Fast and Furious gun trading practice, giving guns to Mexican criminals merely to gain gun control legislation.  They knew about the thousands of deaths. They knew the guns used were the ones they provided.  They did nothing to end the practice.  The deaths continue to escalate due to their fervor for gun control.

Remember this the next time abortion is discussed. Importantly, pay attention to whom, and which party act to protect this practice - they are complicit.  They assure money is provided to perform the dissection procedures.  I do/did see a place for abortion.  This, however, has me reconsidering that position because infant dissection would remain an opportunity to tempt the greedy, envious, and hateful Left.  One participant caught on video, declares she wants a fancy car; and selling the parts at a higher price will help her buy the car.

Meet the modern Progressive Left!

God Help Us...

Monday, July 27, 2015

Obama Unintentionally Speaks the Truth

The Current Occupant violated his central speaking tenets while in Kenya.  He normally lies no matter what the topic. Even when the truth will more than  adequately convey his point, he chooses deceit - if only to embellish his remarks, or personal contribution.  He said: "When you start treating people differently not because of any harm they are doing to anybody, but because they are different, that's the path whereby freedoms begin to erode".  We agree.  He went on to state: "...bad things happen" when groups are legally isolated and denied basic freedoms.  Again, we agree.  He then went further -  "As an African-American, I am painfully aware of what happens when people are treated differently under the law." We concur. This blog has advocated for essential, Constitutional Liberties be afforded every legal American citizen.  Moreover, restoring the rights of those people who were denied their liberties fifty years ago to provide a leg-up to others whom some claimed could not adequately compete and advance, without that gift, is long overdue.

Blue Collar White Males are treated disparately and all forms of government sanction the disparity.  The strange and confounding aspect and history of the practice is how few members of the black community took advantage of the gifts given them.  This reality contradicts the assertion "Everyone is equal in every way".  Many more blacks would utilize the gift - if they were willing, and/or able to so do. There is a nominal minimum standard that requires showing up regularly and employing a modicum of effort.  It appears, if history is an indicator of ability and ambition, a majority of blacks will not, or cannot qualify.

The President certainly took advantage of the gift.  He would not sniff at the Presidency were it not for the intimidation that accompanies the practice. Any evaluation is evidence of racial enmity.  Nominal critique is full blown KKK style hatred.  Additionally, Mr. Obama could not qualify for the admissions at any Ivy league school without the weighted benefits given black applicants.  He was a lousy student by his own admissions.  His election to Law Review was entirely a consequence of guilt laden white faculty and white students wishing to prove they are not racist.  Black faculty members sought the unearned placement to shove their weight around.  Obama's characteristics described by Harry Reid acurately describes why he was selected - clean, well-spoken, not having a black dialect (unless he needed one).

BCWMs includes Christian men who are further discriminated against - legally.  These men are the last considered, if they are considered at all.  Their religious views make them unemployable in government and larger prvate sector firms that must capitulate to racial quotas.  Degreed white males face a separate environment.  The demands of professional employment self- regulate due to the academic training requirements. However, even these white men men face discrimination in career advancements in their fields.  Less qualified, and often incompetent candidates are placed due to race, sex, and sexual behaviors quotas, and political objectives.  This is most true in government and agency employment.  Universities too openly discriminate - even when voters pass laws to end the practice.

America cannot thrive and achieve its potential unless and until all people are evaluated meritoriously - solely.  Color-blind? Yes!  Irrespective of sex? For most positions - Yes!  Areas where physical strength and size are requisite must never be compromised with physically weaker candidates - no matter what.  Sexual behaviors - No.  This is a choice and in no way is grounds to elevate a candidate. Once that practice is given credence, any behavior may be used to disqualify potential candidates.  Obama's comments were offered to advance gay rights in Kenya - where it is illegal to practice homosexuality - like the USA prior to 1970s. Homosexuality was treated successfully as a mental illness.  Democrats needed to cull votes from gays and other groups like them who were once marginalized in society as they represented deviance and mankind has an overabundance of deviance.  It degrades the society and begs for more indecency. 

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

God's Dissatisfaction and Condemnation of Large Urban Enclaves

Lot and his family learned about this when they entered Sodom. The term "Iniquity" abounds in scripture when referencing cities; large urban enclaves.   Genesis, Ezekiel, Hosea, Daniel, Habbakuk, and many other references define the Lord's displeasure and condemnation of cities.  Iniquity is is bred and thrives in large congregations.  Large masses of humanity provides anonymity, and the civility required to establish and maintain law and order (by indulging or permitting a variety of opinions) inspires and feeds iniquity. The city codifies and perfects the behaviors synonymous with iniquity.  In terse terms, God hates cities. He knows what transpires when large groups of men and women congregate. How many large scale disasters and spiritual discontinuity are avoided if large numbers of people do not coexist in a condensed environment?  The Tower of Babel was the result of mankind conspiring to visit, and become, God(s).  The economy of scale, and increase of available labor, do provide advantages.  Many of mankind's accomplishments cannot, do not, occur in small populations.  It's a practical impossibility.

Small communities typically embrace a confederation of beliefs and behaviors that are implemented as laws and ordinances.  Smaller groups do not provide the ability to hide behaviors and actions that violate the laws ennumerated.  The benefit, and for some, the detraction of a small town, is the loss of anonymity.  People know what their neighbors do - sometime intimately.  The small town environment generally produces compliant, civil, behaviors - much more so than cities.  Support that aids in compliance is another benefit.  The virtues that assembled the community initally often work to sustain compliant Good behaviors.  The subsistence of the population is also affected - due in part to the insight prevalent.  A shared belief system additionally requires neighbors care for each other, and they are apprised of their neighbor's predicaments.  Small communities provide its members an ability to better align themselves with God's commandments.  Conversely, cities do not, will not reflexively provide and care for one another.  The anonymity extends to concealing selfish, amoral desires.

The problems society at large faces today are exclusively produced by cities.  Cities with millions of inhabitants are incapable of providing for themselves! This fact becomes acute when the government programs created to coerce the population to care for the poor and needy, or to building infrastructures to sustain the large population.  Cities start out decrying religious interests as they typically provide friction between parties.  Religion prevents city dwellers from indulging behaviors and desires a majority favor.  Many locate to the city expressly to gain access to those behaviors and other selfish benefits.  Unfortunately, the city, and the selfish, decadent population do not wish to spend their own money to realize what is needed to provide their indugences.  They must extend taxes to rural areas in order to pay for the cities overt and contrived needs.  It is then the city finds religion.  They misuse religion to intimidate and spiritually threaten rural religiously minded people.  Christ's plea to care for the poor is ubiquitously repeated to insult religious people; hoping to compel them to part with their money voluntarily. When they resist, taxes are used to confiscate their incomes.  Religious precepts are used to justify the theft.

If each community was required to live within their means, cities rapidly become less appealing, and... more treacherous.  The law of the jungle swiftly rises to the fore once safety and other risks to survival are threatened.

Therein lays God's ambivalence and hatred towards cities.  Cities are Satan's playground.  

Thursday, July 16, 2015

The Poverty Myth

Have you ever wondered how some people are able to afford cell phone, hair braids and extensions, elaborate nails, their children wearing the newest tennis shoes and never hold a job? It's easy - if you belong to a sanctioned minority and bear children you cannot afford.

(Since the day this entry was written, Obama phones were added to the generous compensation WANAs receive for existing.  I read yesterday they will next receive fiber optic web access!  I can't afford that type of connection.  Additionally, HUD is about to begin forcing developers to add low-incomes units to their projects - regardless of the retail home costs.  Even existing developments may have these low-income units added.  Local jurisdictions will be lured to participate with large government off-sets.  

Follow the steps below.

Presently, almost 50% of Americans pay no taxes at all to the federal government. Many receive a tax refund – even when paying no taxes. The Earned Income Tax Credit is one example of how Progressive Democrats pay the indolent to vote. Many term this redistribution of wealth. Who qualifies? Democrats call them Working Americans, the Needy, At Risk, Underemployed, and the Working Poor. Let's generically term them WANAs. WANA = Working American, Needy, At risk

These Citizens (and non-citizens) earning under $34,000.00 annually qualify for the tax credit. If a WANA has two children, they receive $4,000 each month from the Feds and another $1,750 from the State. This is a 17% subsidy added to other “incentives” to work as little as possible. Eligible WANAs are entitled to own a home and a car – not counting against the asset restrictions imposed to ostensibly limit eligibility. If their child can be diagnosed with one of the “D” mental disorders: LD, ADHD, ADD, OCD, HDD, DDT, DOA, DOB, DVD, DNA, Eating DD, Learning DD, Conduct/behavioral DD – the family becomes eligible for Social Security payments due to the mental “disability”. The list of eligible “mental health problems” that qualify for a disability label are extensive and cover so many “D" Disorders” they are meaningless. This practice appears a scam - to meet SSI disability criterion, and put tax money into the pockets of mental health providers.

From a doctor's perspective - Medicare payments are better than no payments. Since there is no restrictions for retesting the child for stupidity – why not make the diagnosis? The psychiatric community colludes in the same way climate scientists collude in advancing Global Warming. There are financial considerations that apparently transcend credibility and reputation so long as the payments and research grant money keeps coming. Developing the "D" disorders was a clever scam to make money the Progressive way - stealing it from tax payers by providing services to people who are unable to negotiate life unassisted.

"D" Disorder diagnosis serves another useful purpose - to nullify the disparity in academic aptitude test scores. This supposedly explains the difference/shortfall in student abilities that fall along racial lines. It’s a disability – not stupidity!  Those teaching benefit too. IQ assessment exams of students directly reflect upon an "Educator's" ability to instruct; which affects their continued employment and advancement. No Child Left Behind has requirements that students achieve a measurable degree of intelligence. Student scores stand to impact a teacher's evaluation. However, if the student is diagnosed as stupid; errr... unable to learn, the number of "disabled" are weighed (subtracted) when the teacher is evaluated.

That family with two Disabled children qualifies for another $900.00 per month or $10,900.00 annually for the disability. The total family income stands at near $51,000.00 for the “WANA family with two un-smart children. If the WANA family qualifies for TANF (TEMPORARY Assistance to Needy Families) they get all of the benefits listed above AND Food Stamps! Qualified WANAs are additionally eligible for Heath Insurance from the Fed and State. In some instances, WANAs begin receiving subsidies at conception. Add to this prenatal care, and, even more money - if the mother is unable to work due to pregnancy. FYI...WANAs are historically predisposed to not work while pregnant.

Medical coverage for the birth is provided -- as is motherhood training. Then the monthly payments increase due to the child. There’s more…there are ancillary incentives: food programs doled out through pre-school. They include breakfast and lunch. The government also provides funding for Communities with Children at Risk. These include - Pre-school costs – to fund the school, its faculty, facilities, tuition, after-school care, community based programs, work/jobs programs, midnight basketball programs, food gifts and other “keep kids outta trouble” gifts/programs. The total dollar value of these gifts are intentionally not calculated.  LBJ developed a plan to hide these expenses throughout the agencies of government – military, interior, transportation, etc…

The Needy family of Working Americans is paid, at a minimum above, at the national income average of $60,000.00 per family. BUT… They pay No taxes.  They receive the Tax Credit/Gift noted above. If they inherited or purchased property – they keep it. Buy a car– they keep it. Neither of these two assets disqualifies them from receiving federal and state aid.  56% of those classified as living in poverty own their homes.

Assistance from the private sector/churches must also be summed to measure exactly how much money is provided to WANAs.

The reward to society for all the assistance they provide, are children who fail to attain a 40% graduation rate from high school.

After the majority of Children at Risk drop out of school, most go on to the criminal justice system where costs continue to accrue and expand into other areas that consume even more Federal dollars – or - a young woman becomes pregnant and the cycle begins anew.

The Census Bureau when tasked to determine what classified poverty – could not agree! Census was paid $600,000.00 to study the problem and find solutions. The final report included a nebulous statement that admitted – they were unable to find consensus on what amount of income and asset threshold equated to poverty. This supports the assertion that when confronted with evidence that shows poverty is overstated – the Census / Government / Progressives will claim it exists anyway; and restate their desire to overcome it. This study and recommendation is followed with requests for more tax dollars, to find the answer(s) to poverty. Keeping the tax dollars flowing into poverty research keeps Census workers employed. This explains why so few welfare applicants are denied - ditto the unemployed. If applicants are disqualified, the work load decreases. Long term job security is tied to assuring every applicant qualifies for government assistance.

The Census report also included a myriad of exceptions, obfuscation, conflicting statements, and facts. So many irregularities were discovered-- the Census Bureau disavowed their work – HUH?!!! (PSSST! Uhhhhh…. We dunno… Our boss refuses to allow us to tell the truth).

WANAs are a favorite target of Federal and State largess. After all, they are“Needy”, “At Risk”, “The Working Poor”. The euphemisms used to describe this sub class are diverse. The one aspect they share is a collective desire to live the American Dream – using other people’s money. They might suffer were it not for Uncle Sam’s sharing with them. They might be forced into desperation and unorthodox acts. Few know it was unorthodox acts the government used to persuaded the tax payers to pay for WANAs in the first place. Threats of violence – borne of acts of real violence, were a mainstay of political activism in the 1960s and afterwards. The mid-1960s was a time filled with riots and looting – all justified by Progressive Democrats. Property owners and residents living near the riots were scared into paying higher taxes. They hoped paying the taxes would prevent the riots coming to their neighborhoods. It's no different than paying protection money to mobsters. Progressive Democrat politicians concluded it was better to rob the taxpayers and reap the benefits associated with giving. They may become the targets of violence themselves, otherwise.

In my opinion, it is one thing to pay someone welfare, raise taxes, directly admit why, and for whom you are doing it; then stand for re-election. It is another matter entirely to cloak the welfare in the form of tax subsidies, SSI disability payments, food stamps, social programs and an assortment of costs that are spread into every government agency to hide the true costs caring for WANAs requires. All of the costs to care for WANAs are line items that belong in the Health and Human Services budget. They are not. The departments of agriculture, defense, transportation, labor, housing, interior, energy, military, etc… in fact - all the agencies of the Federal Government share in the deception.

Were the total WANA costs ever exposed the taxpayer might revolt - hence, the subterfuge purposely created by President Lyndon Baines Johnson, LBJ.

I quote LBJ: "These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again."

Once LBJ accomplished this goal to bribe blacks he then said: "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."

We are left to wonder how many blacks know what LBJ/Democrats really think of them? More importantly, how many knew he planned to use them; enslave them with dependency? And perhaps even more important… how many black Americans care that the lives they lead are financed using a government “protection racket” that mandates workplace and academic apartheid – that:

a.Unmeritorious elevates black eligibility for employment and academic admission?

b. places unqualified blacks in positions where life, death, and economic solvency decisions are made?

c. dilutes the meritorious achievements and credentials of others races?

d. punishes people who critically evaluate human behaviors and develop opinions contrary to a racial dogma promulgated by Democrats?

Or, do black Americans only care about: the benefits they receive – extracted from the burdens heaped upon their countrymen by government, and the political power blacks use (and abuse) to punish and disenfranchise better qualified members of other races?

By the time LBJ assumed the Presidency, Democrats had steadily lost the support from white, Christians – males in particular. LBJ sought to punish white men by increasing the scope and control of government over their daily lives (affirmative action policies) and tax hikes. He is also noted for initiating the Politically Correct rubric – using pejorative words and ideas that work to denigrate people opposed to Democrat policies - like: "Offensive". (Search the archives of this blog for a lesson on Offensive).

Let’s examine a few I referenced earlier: Working Americans, Needy, At Risk, Working Poor, and… no Democrat list is complete without "The Children".

1. Working Americans are pleasant sounding words that convey an old timey conventional paradigm. Americans– that must mean they are citizens. Working – that must mean they are responsible and employed. Combined the term conveys a self reliant citizen – the Everyman. These words are a cleverly constructed misnomer. Democrats love to play with words. It’s that conversational legalese which they mold into easily spoken and understood catch phrases that obfuscate reality and nebulously depict horrors in a friendly, romantic, non-threatening manner. I don’t know, but suspect, there is an entire department inside the DNC dedicated to creating these political puns– they are plays on words.

2. Needy…everyone stands in need of something. Some need a swift kick in the pants and a stern lecture to stop complaining, stop breeding, and get to work. That's insensitive, intolerant, uncompassionate, hurtful, and possible grounds for termination. The Democrat model of the Needy is a person incapable of conducting life on their own. They are to be pitied and compassionately cared for from cradle to grave. It’s never their fault. No matter what chronic bad choices, unorthodox/criminal behavior, foolhardy breeding practices they display. Democrats tell them, and lecture us, it’s not their fault. Law abiding, traditional value adherents, Americans who through effort and sacrifice live a better life, are expected to be tolerant of these misbehaviors and compassionately serve these parasites without question.

3. “At Risk”… of what? At Risk of misbehaving and going to jail? At Risk of harming the law abiding? At Risk of decision making that will further lead them into dependence? Maybe it’s me, but I think the community at large is at much greater RISK from people who are classified as At Risk, than the At Risk are from the community. Perhaps that’s what they mean – Society is At Risk.

4. The“Working Poor” tells me they are not working hard enough, or they may be intellectually deficient/disabled, or maybe they mismanage their incomes. Surveys of the Poor reveal they are neither poor, nor are they working, in many instances. What they are is greedy and unapologetic. They demand something for nothing and threaten to misbehave more if their demands are not met.

5. "Under Employed" is another phrase. This pre-supposes they have a skill set that would lead to better employment. If so why not seek and secure those better jobs? I suspect they can’t or they would do that. The tacit contrivance of Under Employed is that they are prevented from better employment by some external and oppressive source. Surely, there must be some who are Over Employed – I’m guessing that CEOs of large corporations and other Rich Fat Cats fall into that category. People “Not Paying Their Fair Share” are the over employed. Not Paying a Fair Share jeopardizes The Children.

6. The “Children” are NEVER to blame. These “Children” are entitled to a better life... a chance at the American dream. These are the same children who disrupt the classroom, bully, refuse to learn, and choose Gang life as a profession. They procreate early in their teens, and do everything they can to remain in poverty – a trait learned from their parents.

Anyone who plans long term, practices self reliance, manages their acts of procreation (within the confines of their incomes) are somehow morally obligated to care for others who refuse to endure the sacrifices required to enjoy a law abiding standard of living. Democrat policy demands society be responsible; and absorb the costs of misbehavior, sloth, stupidity/disability, never complain or ask – Why? Progressive label makers stand at the ready to contemporarily tar and feather any “trouble makers” who fail to accept their role in the Progressive collective without question. Racist, phobe, hater, unenlightened, intolerant - ists and isms abound to permanently ruin anyone who resists the Democrat Party directives. A few strategically placed terminations, prosecutions and scapegoats later… people become enlightened – and fear filled.

Democrat assertions of not paying a fair share are usually followed with others slurs highlighting the income gap between the Richest 1% and our Working Americans – as if there is a mean income that everyone is entitled to receive. This includes those refuse to work Working Americans. This illogic implies by virtue of their having life, Democrat dependents are entitled to some mean standard of living. And -- should the WANA complain what's given them is insufficient, that’s understandable. Those Over Employed types should Pay Their Fair Share –so that the WANAs lead a better life.

To hammer this point home, we hear their ancestors were slaves, or otherwise oppressed. Slavery and/or oppression are at least in part to blame for their misfortunes and attitudes. Slavery was abolished 150 years ago, but that time factor is unimportant to Democrats. Slavery conveys a horrible scene and that horror is effective when blaming and tindering guilt. Guilt and blame are requisite when arguing disparity. A person blamed is counted upon to feel guilty. Add a threat of violence, and/or professional penalties that include losing advancement opportunities for harboring improper views on race, or diversity, and people are much less likely to complain when they are robbed/taxed; or asked to accept change to their detriment.

The Democrat narrative advanced follows: If slaves were paid, their descendants would have a better life today. Apparently, the same people who are incapable of managing their incomes and lives... those who cannot or will not take advantage of all the sanctioned, specific preferences available in the US--including unconstitutional preferences -- specifically legislated, enacted, and adopted to grant Democrat sanctioned groups advantages... and the funds to pay for them... opportunities that are not available to their fellow countrymen... would never mismanaged their financial affairs regardless of economic downturns. They would avoid the downturns that bankrupted or negatively affected the economic fortunes of other non-sanctioned groups. Their fiscal intuition is so substantial and comprehensive, had they been paid as slaves - they wouldn’t have to work at all. Maybe that is why they refuse to work now. Most seem satisfied to live a life that requires they do as little as humanly possible.

When confronted about the excessive crime associated with low-income communities, Democrats complain crime is only chosen because of economic disparity. Murder, Rape, Assault, Knock-out game are crimes I have difficulty making that connection - but I’m not enlightened - in Democrat speak. Getting caught is a Risk the WANA are willing to accept and I think I know why. Being convicted of a crime results in their living life as specified in the Progressive Democrat Utopia – prison.

In prison, everyone is treated equally. Convicts wear the same clothes, live in the same surroundings, eat the same food, and no one is elevated above another – unless they behave in a way that results in their losing privileges – but that is a subjective, chosen, outcome. Prison is the perfect example of the Progressive’s Utopia. That must be why Commies sent dissidents to prison, or internment camps. That form of re-education was effective and placed the problem person in an environment where they were forced to confront the Utopian benefits attendant a Progressive, centrally planned, way of life. Whenever a person draws back the curtain on this deception, or, they accept what their physical senses and judgment reveals to them, the Democrat media are called in to ruin that person - See Trump. 

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Celebrating the Death of Christians in South Carolina

One common and consistent practice of Marxists and Communist, groups calling themselves Progressives and Liberals in the USA, is rewriting history. Eliminating truth and tradition is a necessary ingredient to remove freedom and subdue the population under the boot heel of tyranny; or the mentally deranged wishes of the despot currently occupying a building in DC that should be razed - if eliminating oppressive and offensive relics from the past is really the objective.  Objects like the Confederate flag and officers that served in the confederacy are obviously not the real objective, but they serve to distract and provide objects for distorting reality for political purposes.  Promulgating fear, hatred, and violence using the tacit crime of offense to justify the actions, is a novel approach that grew out of Democrats needing the votes from members of society that were once considered, and diagnosed, as mentally, ill, deviant, and/or criminals.  Crisis must not be wasted - a former associate and employee of the boy who never could bring himself to admit his father didn't care for him, did not want him, revealed in an unguarded moment. That crisis that brings the nation to this madness is a direct consequence of legitimate, psychological disorder that has lingered and metastasized for decades - unrequited, or addressed.  The current madness was caused by a father abandoning his son. The abandoned child rearranged reality and assumed an egomaniacal persona to mitigate the hurt, loneliness, and despair that arose. This volatile circumstance grows more menacing when the father is not the father and probably conveys that confusing truth to the erstwhile offspring.  The twisted emotions that turn each morning into an unavoidable desperate panic drives the child to pick from a menu of psychosis or suicidal entrees - retreat into an emotional morass where a lifetime of counseling is needed to survive, or assume megalomaniacal posture, create a separate reality where the father's absence of affections is cast at the feet of strangers who are conveniently packaged for blame.   The later was the option taken.  

This blog has run far afield from the title - as has the solution sold to ameliorate the damage done when Christians were murdered in a church.  The picture of the murderer chosen by the media was selected because it shows him in a room adorned with a Confederate flag.  The flag is not what they wanted to eradicate, it is the political influence and liberties of the people who treasure that flag.  This is not the first step to marginalize that group, nor is it likely to be the last.  Punishing people who hold alternative, traditional views is the actual objective.  Democrats must receive votes from non-traditional and deviant citizens.  Democrats no longer represent main stream America.  The recent attacks on Donald Trump  clearly reveals how reality is purposely distorted, lies compiled to build an illegitimate narrative, and then reported, non-stop about the lies published to fill the public mind with so much incorrect information the limited acumen of most can not discern truth from fiction.  Add hyperventilated emotional content, and the media prevents the majority from investigating on their own what was actually said.  Trump dared to challenge the lies and myths concocted to deceive the public about the behaviors of people who illegally entered this nation.  They are criminals!  They broke immigration laws.  What else they do after arriving does not eliminate the initial crime - regardless of the compassionate fiction written to absolve them of criminality.  Most are unaware Sanctuary Cities were created so these illegals could vote!  Over 200 cities act to disenfranchise the votes of legitimate Americans.  This in addition to the other illegal, criminal voting practices Democrats employ goes a long way to their stealing elections.  If the voting laws on the books were followed, it is unlikely Democrats win many elections outside areas where they created absolute dependency. Those citizens vote themselves a pay raise, or benefit hike each election.  Most do not hold jobs or pay taxes.  They subsist off the efforts of traditional people who now must earn enough money to care for their families, and another family, or more.  

The madness circulating across America will not end soon.  If Iran is allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon, they will provide them to their friends and the Middle East will probably erupt in the chaos predicted by John.  Most do not know the government has built Internment camps for US citizens.  The Jade Helm 15 activities are practice to round up people who disagree with Democrat policy making.  Killing them in the streets and/or placing them in the camps, confiscating their property, and installing Marshall Law could very well be in our future.  Citizens must become politically active and elect a President determined to undue the damage done the past eight years, and end the government over reach that occurred over the previous fifty years.  Everyone will be impacted negatively.  The price of freedom is not carefree.  We will all pay in ways we never considered.  Bloodshed will follow.  I prefer this outcome to the one where citizens run like lemmings into the arms of comfort and safety promised by Democrats.  

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Trump & Southern Christians Under Assault

Is it just me, or do others see the Confederate flag attack as the next phase in a systematic targeting of Blue Collar White (Southern) Males?  BCWMs are disenfranchised as group and this dates back to when affirmative action laws were first penned.  The Left, Liberals, and Progressives - RE: Democrats knew they could not compete in elections if BCWMs were not ostracized and condemned as a "Hate Group".  Southern white males got lost in the shuffle when the Democrat party chose to confederate around splinter groups and advocate for special rights for groups they could make dependent upon government subsidy.  Dependency assures votes and political allegiance.  

Since that change, any politician that ventures into defending or preserving the rights of Southern whites, or white males generically is not so politely attacked.  The current attack on Trump is representative of what happens to any politician who even remotely seeks to tap the BCWM votes.  After all, it is not BCWMS who suffer most from illegal immigration?  Is it not their jobs illegal take?  

Yes, Democrats fear BCWMs more than any other group because they possess the vote numbers to end fifty years of Progressive effort and law making.  AT a minimum, 20 million votes go untapped each election cycle.  Add their wives - and you see quickly why Democrats fear this group. 40 million votes are wasted.  Look no further than the current treatment of Trump to gain insight on what will be done to any politicians who hints at supporting these men.  Most politicians lack the financial resources to fight back, or ignore and endure the attacks.  Trump has lost tens, maybe one-hundred million dollars for his words.  It’s not only the candidates who are attacked - anyone showing support for the candidate receives a similar dose of bad press and slime - which is why many associates bailed on Trump.  It’s truly unbelievable (and insightful) how much the Left fears BCWMs.

There is no comparison to the treatment displayed at anyone seeking to advocate for white rights - it is vehement and comprehensive.  Do not the media portray BCWMs on TV shows as stupid, beer swilling, NFL and sex obsessed, incompetent fathers and spouses?  BCWMs are treated like pariahs by Republicans and Democrat alike.  

BCWMs see no difference in the parties.  Neither party will demand an end to affirmative action and other race and sex specific laws that disenfranchise them collectively.  They purposely replaced blacks at the back of the bus once the race laws and race preference laws were enacted - by design!  That was the main point of the affirmative action.  It wasn't providing an advantage to minorities - too few take advantage of the benefits.  

The persistence of affirmative action laws cannot be argued a paradigm shift in the outcomes the Left declares they seek.  That shift has never, will never occur.  Nearly fifty years of outcome testifies to the accuracy of this statement.  Additionally, the majority who benefit from affirmative action laws do not need the advantage.  There is another significant negative... affirmative action depreciates the accomplishment made - inferring the beneficiary could not compete directly, and the benefit artificially inflated their accomplishment.

The true purpose of affirmative action was preventing white males from gaining access to jobs and college admission, and thereby erect a comparative benchmark was, and remains, the goal.  Keeping BCWMs under-employed and poorer also prevents them from mounting a challenge to reinstitute their civil rights, and the Left assiduously works to assure that topic is not addressed, or acted upon.

If half of these men were motivated to vote - it send a clear mandate that cannot be ignored.  Truly, they represent the fast track means to end secular liberal oppression and restore virtue and valor in America.