Thursday, May 28, 2015

The Political Change Needed to Repair a Nation

Ward Connerly is an accomplished man.  He was a Regent at the University of California, and a political activist who advocates ending Affirmative Action laws.  Mr. Connerly was recognized by numerous organizations that respect and value the components and objectives that define the work product of his life.  He is a religious man who knows the importance spirituality places in a life, and the difficulties that obtain when a person attempts to negotiate life - sans the direction and the attendant moral responsibilities spirituality provides and demands.  

Mr. Connerly is a realist and comprehends the obvious.  He is a man who cherishes his God, family and the American culture that provided him the opportunities he applied to advance his work, and create a remarkable, competent professional record.  Mr. Connerly’s actions and comments allude to the significant benefits he associates with the American Culture, and displays his disdain for cleverly constructed misnomers and “equivalents” - that are purposely subjective and relative interpretations of the culture that blessed him. Mr. Connerly is a black man.  Undoubtedly, he faced prejudices and discrimination during his life.  He also knows all men face the same, or similar conflicts, as race forms only a portion of the obstacles every man must overcome if they wish to succeed.  Mr. Connerly’s comments suggest he judges the race obstacle as unavoidable - as long as humans have sensory organs. Race, as a obstacle, he views as less important than the other difficulties arising when Progressive equivalent policies and programs are enacted.  Specifically, the motivations behind the policies and programs – noxious racism and a autocratic mindset, are devoid of the charitable claims used to advance the equivalent objectives.

Owed to his race, Mr. Connerly came to understand every benefit promised by government, or developed in a social engineering construct of compassion, holds a nefarious side. Occasionally, that side conceals insidious and destructive components - articles that necessarily are married with lies and deceit. The despotic objectives of the organizations and people propounding racial compassion and assistance are antithetical.  These are acutely vicious and disparaging when the structure of the policies of professed benefits are strategically organized to control, or restrain, the liberties, and obligations, granted each citizen in the Founding documents.  These policies are developed by a consensus of academic of opinions formed by cohorts of the political organization seeking control over the citizen or group they claim (and use) as a political weapon.  Research and study collide in an “opportunity of oppression” deceitfully labeled and packaged under the auspices of collective compassion, where a guilty party is inserted to draw ire and instill suspicion. Each new policy and program relies upon the same protocols of libel, slander, and FEAR.

A responsible repressive villain is (needed and) identified, then attacked, for the expressed purpose of indemnifying the group the charity charlatans need to obtain a political ambition. Each government benefit must use the force of law to compel the objects of the charlatan’s compassion, propagate and inure endemic, slothful, human habits; that cede self worth and responsibility for a bag of magic beans that are promised to restrain and punish the villain, provide prosperity, and better the lives of those perpetually oppressed by groups and individuals seeking to do them harm, or erect disadvantages to their ambitions. The votes are cast to secure the benefits promised - a bridle of subsidy, and yoke of enslavement worse than the one voiced in argument to heighten passions by recalling events none of the audience ever experienced, but were told, were awful.  Another disadvantage is referenced, Segregation. The vast majority of the group never experienced that outcome either, but, as with the first offense, are told it was horrible and intolerable. The actual consequences of segregation are never mentioned, although reason suggests the consequences are vitally important to learning the intolerable consequences. 

Black marriage, legitimate child birth, high school & university graduation, racially specific professional accomplishments, business ownership, and all the hallmarks of success were in greater abundance when segregation was law.  Mentioning these incidents are conspicuously avoided.  The actual outcomes present a dichotomy - and a glaring finger of blame.  Both are cloaked in a narrative of persistent, unavoidable oppression. A white boogie man hides in the shadows studying every move and thought produced in the black community.  The boogie man is responsible for the despicable conditions, absence of collective accomplishment, and creating irresistible forces that inexplicably draw black people into noxious, destructive behaviors that bring death, injury, ignorance, and irritability.  Teaching the causal factors for the current and past outcomes are “strang verboten”  as it would undermine and expose the actual objectives of the charitable charlatans who loathe the race they claim directs their compassionate actions.  Affirmative action and other racial subsidy/dependence laws are specifically constructed, and protected, to enslave blacks and permanently sentence them to lives of disparate and destructive ends. The Democrat Party foments the outcomes present, and their actions protecting the failed policies and programs is evidence of their actual racial preferences. In the Democrat's political ambitions, blacks are an unfortunate, but necessary commodity, required to acquire sufficient votes to advance their malignant mission of racial and sexual malfeasance, and cultural suicide that presents.

Ward has personally confronted the disparity these types of laws require.  Providing race, sex, & sexual behaviors advantages are the sole purpose for these laws.  They were first presented once Democrat came to realize Everyone is truly NOT Equal in Every Way - as was first assumed.  The majority of the Democrat Party initially opposed civil rights laws. Southern Democrats vociferously opposed the laws. They represented states where the problems with multiculturalism were acute, but improved from today by comparison.  White Northern Democrats eventually realized the benefits of controlling the votes of the black race, as voiced by Lyndon Baines Johnson. That prompted their seeking to enact Affirmative Action laws, "AA".  These were the second wave of race laws specifically scribed by Democrats to make blacks dependent upon the Democrat Party – regardless of the negative outcomes Democrats knew, or suspected, they would foster.  Hubert H. Humphrey publicly declared he would eat the bill, if quotas, based upon a racial composition arose - a blatant, demonstrable lie.  AA was sold as merely providing competent, deserving black applicants extra consideration for jobs and academic admissions, et al.  Humphrey never did eat the bill. 

Welfare and other subsidies, like affirmative action, were the bribes, or political lures used to re-enslave the black community and voters.  The consequences of these laws are ignored, or encouraged by Democrat omissions.  Black on black crime is anticipated.  This explains why white Democrats avoid living in the communities with the objects of their confessed compassion.  Conspicuously, these Democrats live in gated communities, far, far away from the violence they've sewn. They are professionally accomplished people who might do some good if they actually lived in the neighborhoods they claim captures their concern.

Black males killing black males is a late term abortions in the perspective that scribes policies that tolerates, and encourages, the deaths.  The white boogie man excuse has outgrown the Democrat’s ability to control, or use with any amount of civility.  Crime is reaching into white communities by design, or Democrats have created a Frankenstein monster they miserably failed to calculate the potential bad outcomes. Democrats need fear present everywhere - to operate the political protection racket they use to leverage outcomes in their favor

Democrat laws of prejudice are the problem for Black America.  Few recognize the consequences of coerced compassion specifically designed to ruin communities and lives.  Affirmative Action, and every other law that deprives the civil rights of a person not named in the group obliged to the Democrat Party, must end.  Generations of sloth and dependence, with ancillary behaviors that reduce the significance of human being to a vote, are insidious and despicable.  Those who promulgated these laws, including black Democrats in Congress, are ostensibly acting to perpetuate dependence upon Democrats, are criminals - who deserve prosecution for crimes against humanity. Ignoring the failed outcomes of these laws is evidence of people who evidently delight in the misery of those whose votes are needed for Democrats to retain political control, and viability.  This ideology is corrupt and serves no reputable end.  The Democrat Party is guilty of devising policies and programs to disenfranchise millions of Americans and secure the destruction of their opportunities, their communities, and their lives. 

Ward Connerly is need today.  He is needed to again voice a call to end affirmative action and other prejudicial laws that offend the civil rights movement and US Constitution.  He must confront weak kneed law makers and civic leaders to demand change that can only come from ending racial equity laws. Personal responsibility is a vital ingredient to conduct life properly, and secure the blessings of God - as our Founders articulated.  Neither God, nor the Founders are the enemy.  Democrats are the enemy of Black America, and that connection must be made glaringly apparent.  

Blue Collar White Males replaced blacks in the back of the bus, after affirmative action laws were penned.  Their votes were simultaneously lost when race crimes ensued - a consequence of the laws.  BCWMs refuse to vote.  No politician will advocate restoring their rights.  Apparently, only a black man can make these comparisons without fear of retribution that ends careers and ruins lives – to perpetuate the moral malignancy and malfeasance of Affirmative Action, and those whose careers rely upon it. Promoting re-establishing the civil rights of blue collar white males will earn their votes, and hopefully overturn half a century of contrived prejudice and disseminated hatred.  No nation can heal unless all have access to equality of opportunity.     

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Science and Academic Dishonesty

The odious hypocrite and cultural contrarian FW Nietzsche is an ignominious character for many reasons.  His professional labors attenuated the demise of decency and religious beliefs, reflecting entirely upon his dissatisfaction with his life, his community, associations, and his efforts to create a meaningful life - based upon adherence to the standards he devised.  Nietzsche never did act to realize what he claimed was essential to his philosophy, truth, and integrity.  That required his becoming a hermit and removing himself from society.  Credibility and legitimacy notwithstanding, he did on occasion happen upon a comment worthy of repeating - "there are no facts, only interpretations" is one of those random comments.  The comment is overtly obvious to anyone paying attention and questioning the world around himself, but Nietzsche received credit for making this observation.  

Nietzsche was the so-called philosopher who stated "God is Dead" - to profit from the newly minted scientific theory which suggested evolution was responsible for life and creation.  Nietzsche saw an opportunity to align himself with science, gain money and notoriety - and took it.  It was an easy and outrageous comment in his time.  Acting outrageously is Nietzsche's claim to fame.  Numerous over the top, irresponsible, inflammatory comments are attributed to him.  Therein lies his contribution to society and mankind collectively - audacity.  The observation on interpretation does supplement Nietzsche's work product and looms as an important consideration; vital to the integrity of the observer and the person making the interpretation. When interpretations stand to radically influence lives and outcomes, they bear watching and a calloused perspective. 

Scientists were once regulated by the implicit conditions and limits articulated in their "Method" to make the same conclusion on interpretations.  Science's Method predates Nietzsche and that casts some doubt upon Nietzsche's authorship of the comment. Perhaps, recent changes within the scientific community  are causal for Nietzsche gaining credit for the observation.  When Nietzsche pronounced God dead, science had just begun the process of murdering God - removing divine influence from their list of potential causalities. As these processes moved forward, numerous divine influences and causalities needed changing, to strip God from consideration.  Natural causes and Man synthesizing causality incrementally began replacing heretofore divine influences throughout science's work.

A considerable obstacle soon appeared.  Mankind and science had not investigated certain difficult domains and that prevented science from "scientifically" providing evidence God played no role in certain disciplines.  The universe's creation was an domain science lacked the technology to gather needed evidence. The cosmos is very, very large and distant. Additionally, quantum, sub-atomic realms were too small for the technology available to provide answers that eliminated a Godly influence. If science could not provide tangible, verifiable causalities that removed any divine influence, God remained a legitimate alternative.  Science was obliged to develop better technologies to remove God.  They did what they could.  They began to investigate the different scales of magnitude with improved tools, and, calculations - to bridge the gaps technology and appropriate investigation tools presented. Science soon learned the tools and technologies needed to gather sufficient legitimate information.  Real evidence was potentially decades away. The potential for mankind never acquiring the tools needed to absolutely verify what is needed to invalidate God was increasingly apparent. Science jettisoned tradition and the philosophical maxim requiring them to admit when they did not know, or could not know, a "Something". Calculations and guesstimations were invented and used.  These accrued - along with the expanding truth, and realization - some realms are too large and too small; moved at speeds impossible to analyze; and probably stood to evade man's best efforts for a considerable time.  

This created a problem.  Science was growing comfortable with the perks given them as they served to provide evidence no God existed.  Science was replacing God as the holder and giver or truth and fact.  The cosmos and quantum realms presented an impediment, as it prevented them from entirely acquiring the considerable power and authority available if God was not an option. Eliminating the potential for a God existing, alternatively, removed God from consideration as a causal variable. Science began utilizing the information and tools available to discredit and denigrate God and belief in God.  Darwin's Theory of evolution was the mechanism utilized.  If science could show evolution was responsible for life arising, and evolving into the various species found, science could rationally infer no God existed.  

Governments and certain societal interests also saw the benefits available to them if God was eliminated.  Religions and belief in God prevented citizens from entirely pledging allegiance to the government.  Businesses and social interests that sought to profit from man's indulging temporal instinctual urges, wanted government to restrict religion and demand legal precedence that prohibited the government from deferring to religion whatsoever.  To so do, government needed science to provide them evidence God never existed.  A pact was formed between science/academe and government.  Government assured funding for research, and science.  Science dedicated specific amounts of research to the ambitions of government.  Business and societal interests, provided campaign funds to government officials who steered research funding to realize the evidence needed.  This collusion expanded and inured into policy and law. Agencies of government arose to specifically add integrity and authority to certain aspects of science that required additional funding and highly specialized research - too costly in the private sector.  The Courts were filled with sympathetic ideologues who betrayed their oaths and used their positions to issue mandates congress and academe could not legally overcome.  The marshaling of manpower and billion dollar budgets assured the success of political ambitions, or alternatively provided the intimidation required to silence opposition.  God officially became a casualty when the school prayer decision was rendered.  Appetites, supposition and desire subordinated interpretation - and facts.  

Miraculously, science evaded scrutiny and their integrity remained in the public consciousness and conscience.  Indoctrination in the public schools helped assure students revered and respected scientists as altruistic and impartial students of their discipline; who would never betray their allegiance to truth and fact.  Government was presented as the ONLY truly impartial entity that always worked to protect the citizen.  Scientists were held up as dispassionate investigators that sought empirical data.  They filtered bias and prejudice from their labors.  Science was portrayed as fighting against incredible odds to obtain sterling information the public could rely upon regardless of the politicians holding a majority, or the president's preferences.  

The inherent dishonesties: philosophy, intellectual, and political science adopted as policies are profuse.  The collaborations and collusions to betray generic honesty by all parties involved are purposeful and serve to confiscate the rights and liberties of the people they claim to represent.  The empirical Method, science ostensibly genuflected in respect, was modified to meet the demands of the moment, and the scientist's appetites and dependencies.  The accepted Methods for proper "Interpretation" - were structured to assure the outcomes desired.  Science sold their services, betrayed their Method, and assumed a prostrate posture to assure government's subsidy of their research.  Fact transformed into a conditional interpretation.  Interpretation eschewed the obvious and impossible.  Truth evolved into a political perspective.  Allegiances were purchased for a sum none of the colluding parties suffered to pay.  The citizenry's tax dollars were used to subdue their fealty and liberties... incrementally.  God passed away in a litany of interpretations made from incredible research.