Monday, June 5, 2017

Christians Cannot be Democrats

If you are a Christian - you cannot vote Democrat.  It's that simple.  You either love the Lord or the Democrat Party but you cannot do both.  

Democrats tried to drop God from their party platform in the 2012 convention.  They were shamed to put God back in.  Democrats work hand in hand with groups whose sole purpose is the elimination of Christian worship.  

Democrats write laws that defy God, outlaw prayer, the Ten Commandments, etc...  They force Christian to choose between government handouts and Christ. Democrats claim they are protecting the mythical Wall of Separation between church and state - it's a lie, and it's hypocritical.  Democrats work to expand rights and government protections for Muslims, atheists, while simultaneously turning a blind eye and ear to Christian rights.  Choosing to not believe in a God is a religious choice!

Democrat offer government handouts to buy the votes of people who are told they are victims.  We are lectured - "it's not their fault they are poor" even when the recipient of the money does nothing to improve their lives and condition.  Not working and not assuming self responsibility betrays Christ's message.  Yes, Christ did say help the needy, but he said much, much more about personal responsibility.  Not being a drain on your neighbor is another commandment some Christians and Democrats ignore.  

Christ never said it is okay to pretend you're a victim to escape responsibility either.  So, taking welfare money long term - defies Christ's message.  What is long term?  One year is illegitimate.  It is okay to go to church and receive help from the church membership.  They will help you become self sufficient - as Christ instructed.  And, you'll get more for inspiration.

Ministers - you must choose.  God or Democrat Party.  You must refuse welfare money as that money is tainted.  It is given you by your enemies.  Any short term gain will be wiped away once you are no longer able to operate a church.  The time is now.  Pick a side.  

Union members...  take back control of your unions.  Get rid of the Democrat operatives who sell you and God down the river.  Make a fist and move the union to the party who offers real choice - not guaranteed government handouts/jobs to union members. That money is washed in the blood of Lucifer.  

Everyone may suffer financially if Democrats are removed from office.  That's life.  You helped Democrats destroy this country and a vibrant economy for your own personal gain. Did you not think there would come a day when the debt must be paid?  

No one ever gives away anything for free.  Keeping people and families dependent upon government is the new slavery.  Remember - it was Democrats who objected to Lincoln, opposed the civil rights laws, and rejected equal opportunity.

Importantly - Opportunity is NOT affirmative action guarantees.  You can thank Democrats for that too.  Blue collar whites took the place of blacks once AA laws were scribed. Did Christ ever suggest prejudice and injustice are OK?  Democrats want blacks and Hispanics on welfare and dependent.  Getting educated and employed allows a person to make up their own minds.  They won't always vote Democrat and Democrats couldn't risk that.  

Black on black murder is a Late Term abortion to Democrats.  This explains why Democrats really won't work to end those crimes.  Democrats pay lip service to these crimes.  What explains why they persist in ignoring them?  The children who escape being killed in the womb, but are murdered later, are one less problem child they must incarcerate, or provide an abortion to for the children they may later produce, or ???  Did you know if abortion was never made legal the black population is 50% larger today?  That is the kind of compassion Democrats offer.  Democrats are not interested in minorities - they hate them - but need their votes!  If anyone actually examines what Democrats do, and how they "Care" for the voters they claim to adore, you discover Democrats have done virtually nothing to change the policies and practices they have always used to control and keep them oppressed. Democrats are Lucifer's disciples.  

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

The Inescapable Responsibility of Choice

May 10, 2017

Sent to Texas Monthly Magazine - a response to their March 2017 edition that included an article on the "Faces of Obamacare".

I write to comment (for publication) on the “Faces of Obamacare”; scribed by: Mr. Michael Hall, March 2017 edition.  I am (currently) a subscriber to Texas Monthly.  The article includes several presumptive conclusions, numerous omissions, and a perfidious premise; promulgated profoundly and explicitly to engender an obligatory sympathy.  Individually, and conjoined, these items are relevant to the health insurance topic.  Unfortunately, the article’s content belayed through omission, the onerous, life altering consequences of Obamacare experienced by a majority of Texans & Americans.

Consider: If a homeowner's dwelling catches fire and burns to the ground, is the homeowner entitled to purchase insurance, after the fire - to recover his loses? Conventional logic and fiscal solvency say no.  An insurance policy, defined, is an instrument designed to abrogate misfortune, which is purchased, BEFORE the misfortune occurs.  Insurance is a hedge purchased in anticipation of a disaster.  The idiom cannot function if a person is permitted to purchase coverage to recover their losses - after the misfortune occurs.  Insurance mandates a person pay to join the insurance collective - if offsetting the costs of misfortune is their objective. People who never bought insurance, regardless of their motivations, who later developed an illness, are not entitled to the benefits of insurance - by virtue of their existence.

Perfidious Progressive Premise:
By virtue of birth, a person existing within the borders of the United States is entitled to make claims upon the property, time, and effort of his fellow countrymen.  No logic, or rational argument, enjoins this gratuitous assertion.  It is a pretentious petard with perverse purpose, hoisted by Progressive politicians upon the body politic – the citizenry.  Religious morality (as a potential causality) is  “Strang Verboten”.  Ergo, an alternative causality must be operative.  Oppressive and insidious language is introduced to compel compliance from the feeble minded - as a dull wit often improperly digests the language in a religious context: “Good Intentions”.  American compassion, based upon a historical anecdote, is bludgeoned and tortured for use in the diabolical narrative.  The Little Guy… the Under Dog… is a popular and compelling emotional solvent unique to Traditional America, where an everyman by using his wits, efforts, and persistence overcomes adversity.  The premise promulgated is not that.    

So who are the people whose birth entitles them to make claims upon his fellowman’s property, time, and efforts?  The English language has a word for them – Ne’er-do-wells.  Ne’er-do-well is another “N” word Progressives despise and fervently work to remove from the lexicon.  They’ve been moderately successful. The term worthless, is one Progressives do not recognize when describing their supporters – irrespective of the appropriateness, and/or accuracy of, the term. 

Dictionary dot com renders the following definition for Ne’er-do-well:  Adjective; “…an idle, worthless person; a person who is ineffectual, unsuccessful, or completely lacking in merit; good-for-nothing”.  Feckless is an alternative adjective.  Whenever a person is unwilling to heed the advice for success in life; advice honed and proofed over millennia, and uses their free will to choose the behaviors of sloth and self indulgence, to the exclusion of all the opportunities presented to every American – school, employment, and goodwill, at some juncture they are responsible for their plight in life.  This analysis runs afoul of Progressive pontification which asserts every life is owed subsidy, regardless of the choices exercised to obtain ignominy.  These choices and outcomes are often additionally burdened  when a woman chooses to bring another life into the failed existence.  In America, she is rewarded for that choice with additional money and other subsidies that are misapplied and squandered to gratify the sloth and self indulgent behaviors.  Compounding misfortune, some Ne’er-so-well employ crime and drug abuse to abet their misfortunes – after calculating the gains they are certain to access from the short-sighted indulgence.  Immediate gratification ignites and sustains these choices.  Long-term considerations and the sacrifices inherent in that planning option seldom materialize. A lifetime of simplistic, egocentric, dilatory decision taking typically renders its due – poverty and misfortune. 

The Progressive Premise indulges these behaviors and choices, and more – they superciliously obligate others (Tax Payers) whenever prescribing policies to confiscate their property, time and efforts, for the purpose of mitigating the disaster forged from Ne’er-do-well behaviors.  These behaviors are chronic, they’ve endured since the dawn of mankind, but recently they are sanctioned and sacrosanct.  A political purpose drives these actions.  The Progressive political aspirations are exclusively tailored to addict the irresponsible to government policies and programs.  Once addicted, their votes are secured.  The exchange of benefits for a favor/vote has a name – Bribery.  Lexis de Tocqueville, a Frenchman opined on the matter after touring America in 1831: “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.” This observation precisely defines modern Progressive policy making.

Every “THING” of value has a price, and ancillary costs. When a benefit is not earned, its value evaporates.

The implementation of Obamacare was costly, and literally included Democrat deliberations behind locked doors. It ended the careers of several Democrat Senators and Representatives. Obamacare ultimately resulted in Democrats losing control of both chambers of the US Congress, and State offices; too numerous to list. Apparently, voters did not appreciate, or attach the same value to, Obamacare - as Mr. Hall did in his endorsement.  Hall’s endorsement was echoed by TM - when they published the article.

Notable Omissions in Hall’s analysis:
A majority of responsible people purchased health insurance - prior to Obamacare's implementation. The statistical reality for insurance coverage in America at that time (which was distorted for political advantage) showed the majority of Americans liked their health care. It was affordable and functioned as they expected. Conversely, the people promoted as not having health care were, and remain, a small minority - Ne'er-do-wells.  The fact they too received medical treatment/healthcare – if not in the manner they preferred, was ignored, or suppressed.  Importantly, they refused to purchase, or contribute to their health insurance.  Inexplicably, even after Obamacare’s implementation, some people do not have their children inoculated. They use the emergency room for treatment. Their focus is not on healthcare, unless and until, disaster strikes – the precise analogy articulated above.  Frankly, these same people are irresponsible.  They have difficulty negotiating their lives.  Democrats condescendingly lecture us all - irresponsible people must never suffer or be denied Free Stuff – to augment their irresponsibility, or the often disastrous consequences of their poor decision taking. 

Responsible people, (count me as one) who reliably purchased health insurance before, and after Obamacare, have seen their insurance premiums skyrocket. Mine increased two and one-half fold. I'm also a business owner who offered health insurance to my employees for twenty years.  They could tailor their policies to fit their lifestyle and medical profile.  The regulations imposed and premium increases, mandated by Obamacare, precluded my offering that benefit... so much for my employees keeping their doctor and policy as Mr. Obama promised.  Apparently, the impact of Obamacare upon over one-hundred million responsible people, who continually carried an insurance policy, do not fit the presumptions or bolster the political message Mr. Hall and TM conspired to produce.  Moreover, these same responsible people often made the choice to purchase insurance knowing that decision would negatively impact their lifestyle and discretionary spending.  True to form, these same people have seen their (Post Obamacare) discretionary spending egregiously reduced.  Their lives are depreciated and endangered accordingly.  However, these self-reliant people proudly refuse to burden others with their troubles.  They anonymously marshal on; desperately negotiating the unavoidable, and unconscionable, hardships foisted upon them.  

Purposely disregarding the billons spent, and the sacrifices made, Progressives openly target responsible people and insultingly label them: “part of the problem” for partisan political purposes.  The responsible are slimed with derisive terms, and openly criticized for wanting their pre-Obamacare lives and incomes returned.  In this narrative, they are not compassionate and have no heart.  The implications are they are nefariously selfish and mean spirited.  Self-reliant, and not burdening society, are never included to describe them.  The responsible and self-reliant must set the bar too high for Progressive comparisons. They must be labeled, libeled, and neglected - whenever possible, or a political narrative needs a villain.   Progressives attack and slander the very people who pay the taxes confiscated to bribe the support and affections of the Ne’er-do-well class they rely upon for votes.  They additionally promote policies that preclude the Constitutional rights of many self-reliant people who ran afoul of Progressive policy goals by virtue of their race, sex, and/or religious preferences. 

Hall's commentary featured an adjunct professor who subjectively chose to NOT purchase insurance coverage, even though the article stated she had a young child. No mention was made of the child’e father who is legally and morally obligated to provide for his daughter.  The mother’s choice invites a variety of negative consequences.  Mr. Hall omitted how and where the adjunct professor spent her erstwhile health insurance dollars. Did the university not offer a group health insurance option?  Mr. Hall noted Ms. Hernandez had Type 1 diabetes.  An adjunct professor should realize the dangers inherent in that type of diabetes.  Moreover, it’s a heritable condition. The age of onset varies. Her daughter could face the same dangers the disease produces.  Ms. Hernandez's age informs the reader she pursues her degree - willfully knowing her condition, her income, and her daughter’s potential exposure to the disease mentioned.  Including alternative life choices, that directly impact the choice options available, choices that act to assure income is available for health insurance, was not documented in the article.  

My children were always covered.  Even when my wife and I were poor, priorities mandated health insurance for our family.  Our careers were forged negotiating the costs of health care.  Personal sacrifice was an ever omnipresent factor deployed in the decisions we made.

Mr. Halls inferential summary: Entitlement and victimhood preclude and excuse  responsible decision taking.  I.E. Bad decisions must be rewarded and abrogated.

Counter: When some “THING” is offered free - the number of takers always increases until the free thing is exhausted.  This outcome occurs inevitably. Better management will not change the outcome.   Like many diseases - It's Terminal – a dangerous political folly ostensibly designed by advocates of the equality of redistribution – Free Stuff.  Karl Marx is the recognized policy author.  Historically, Socialism, Marxism has claimed the lives of over one hundred million people. When demand exceeds supply, demand must be reduced – starvation and execution were the solutions preferred by the advocates of Free Stuff.  BTW… the one-hundred million dead had Free health insurance!

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

Glenn Beck - the EPIC Fail.

No recent conservative personality has failed the traditional ideology more magnificently than Glenn Beck.  Beck's comments and vision so inspired traditional conservative voters they filled the Washington DC mall with over a quarter of a million (or more) people in the summer of 2010.  Beck's fame was such he was able to leave his employer, Fox News, and embark upon a media platform - ostensibly freed from the restriction inherent with any major media outlet.  Anticipation was high that Glenn would propound his message and expand his followers once he was unfiltered and able to deliver didactic on more controversial issues. Beck had criticized programs and policies that invite, endorse, and expand dependency on government. He railed against government spending and endorsed lowering taxes.  Using oblique terms, Beck additionally identified and spoke about the Democrat serial policy and program failures. Glenn insinuated ending unconstitutional government policies that punitively disenfranchise blue-collar, white, Christians (affirmative action, et al) was an essential goal needed to heal the nation.  Ending race, sex, and sexual behavior privilege, subsidy and set-asides was the next logical step to permanently end a political ideology that exclusively used tax dollars and the power of the federal government to bribe and intimidate voters.  

What transpired since Beck's departed Fox defies convention and the expectations of his followers.  It provides a curious insight that may explain the potential causality for Beck's radical transformation once he was free to speak his mind.  

The causalities for Beck's altered opinions include: 

1. The compromise great wealth imparts.  Who funded The Blaze?  Are they the same people that co-opted the Tea Party?  Money has corrupted men and their opinions since the first currency was recognized.  
2. The pressures and conflicts of politics, business and religion.  The objectives defining each are divergent antithetical. A Government disperses rules to assure equality of access, NOT outcomes. Business is the pursuit of profit. Religion is a moral compass and must never be used to temper, or corrupt the operative functionality of government or business. Trying to combine and serve a hybrid is a fool's errand. 
3. The life and death potential in politics is LITERAL. As such, it stands to influence a political messenger and his message.  

Trillions of dollars are at stake.  People are silenced and killed for far less money.  Political murder is a distinct reality.  What Glenn faced is not known and will remain unknown until he snaps or is indicted.  

I first noticed Glenn's change when he went public to offer Teddy Bears for the hordes of illegal immigrants entering the USA.  Huh?! The Glenn we were led to believe would chain himself to prevent illegal entry.  Had Glenn lost his mind? Was he bought and paid for?  If yes, by whom?  K Street lobbyists?  That was my guess. They gave him enough money to indulge, then silence, and eventually ruined him.  

Supporters were stunned.  I did not renew my subscription after the Teddy incident.  Many others canceled too.  The cancellations accrued, apparently.  In desperation, or to garner a new audience with a different perspective, Glenn went on to capitulate, reverse direction, make false accusations, make friends of former enemies, claim consistency, and then insult his loyal supporters and their ideas in deed or by word. Glenn's move to The Blaze either released a pent up conflicted spirit, or exposed a man torn between (IMO) misinterpreted Mormon doctrine and compassion - charity vs self reliance. Giving to the poor is commanded to help the poor give tithes to God - NOT to solve their earthly problems. 

Glenn, like many Republicans, probably wore out - a desire to be liked by media and end their unrelenting assaults - has compromised many.  Glenn worked at CNN before Fox.  He knew the enemy and chose to work with them.  Was that a clue?  Was conservatism a last ditch option - not one Glenn preferred?  Glenn even told listeners he was seriously ill for a time.  His show became a parody of itself and "Incredible" in the purest definition of the word.  

Fast forward to May 2014.  Glenn calls another rally on the Mall in D.C.  A few hundred people showed up.  Losing 249,990 supporters in four years actually takes considerable effort.  The man who held conservatism in his hand, failed to follow through on his promises.  Why remains a question.  As Donald Trump slowly garnered support and then the nomination, Beck went insane for a time, or he revealed the shallow, insecure and insincere man he kept hidden all along.  A Cheetos face protest?  Seriously?!  Defaming and mocking a man who was trying to end the Marxists in Washington - a role Glenn once adopted - was the last straw.  Infantile and obnoxious, Glenn Beck lost his mind and credibility for the last time.  His audience was gone.  

What did Glenn teach us?  Politics cannot be left in the hands of politicians or media spokesmen.  We face a Marxist Communist Left who will destroy the nation the next time they hold a majority.  They will lie and cheat and steal votes to so do.  They are past incrementalism.  Revolution is next. 

Dissolving the nation using cessation, or remaking the Constitution to force term limits, a balanced budget, and ending affirmative action on congress - using the Convention of States - are the last remaining options.  Unfortunately, Glenn Beck won't be there, or remembered for planting and fertilizing the seed that started a renewed conservatism.  

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

White Discrimination - The city of Oakland & State of California

NFL reporter Mike Silver scribed a sniveling short story about the selfish, callous, and unfairness displayed by the NFL's Oakland Raider owner, Mark Davis.  Silver goes off the rails describing the "blue collar" make up of Oakland and how these long suffering fans were held hostage by Raider ownership and ultimately betrayed - twice! Without using the word, Silver made it very apparent owner Davis's GREED was at the heart of the move. Heartless profit and a disregard for the fans were the pivotal elements prompting Davis to move the team.  Pffft!  What rot! Boo hoo!  Raider fans should be mad at the City of Oakland and the State of California.  The Davis family have been at least as patient as Job trying to get a new stadium.

Let's examine a few salient issues regarding Oakland, California, the fans, and Vegas.
California state sales tax = 13.5%.
The Oakland coliseum was in bad repair in the 1970s.  I used to attend games and other events there.  AL Davis, Mark's father, asked for a new stadium in the later 1970s.  His request was blown off.  Steadily, the coliseum began to degrade in earnest as politicians facing "competing demands" differed coliseum revenues to other areas.

We can now add DANGEROUS to the list of adjectives describing the coliseum.  Its a dangerous and dirty building, located in the midst of those "blue collar" fans -  it is in one of the most crime laden areas of Oakland. The Lockwood Gardens Public Housing Authority sits a couple blocks from the coliseum.  Trulia shows a Bright RED color for the number and variety of crimes surrounding the coliseum.

Know too, when the Raiders returned from L.A. they signed a lease with the City of Oakland for three years.  Oakland raised the lease rates even though the agreement made no provisions for the increase.  The city of Oakland had the Raiders by the short hairs and sought to leverage and profit from them - legalities be damned.  The city raised the lease rate five times in next 14 years.  Not surprisingly, little to NONE of the increase revenues went to repairs or good maintenance of the coliseum.  The city and state politicians spent that extra revenue doing what all Democrat politicians do - bribing votes.

Grass Valley is a few miles south of Oakland.  The Zoo is there - as is  the large infrastructure mains required for new developments. Grass Valley has many many acres of public lands wasting away - save for the obligatory windmill farms the state is obsessed to install when ever they see a vacant pasture.  Grass Valley is a good location for a new stadium and I'm certain that location was at least mentioned. Offering a good deal on the public lands would likely kept the Raiders near Oakland.  Alternatively, If the team located over the Altamount Pass - near Livingston - that location remains close and it is primarily open range land - dotted with windmills.

Be aware Mark Davis is obligated to pay the first half a billion dollars for the new Vegas site.  He is invested. IMPORTANTLY - Davis loses that money regardless of any unforeseen bad outcome.  Yes, Vegas offered the team public funds too.  The "public" benefits from the TAX DOLLARS paid by the team - anyone want to guess at that amount of money?  Businesses too benefit from the team in parasitizing off the team - hotels, food, ancillary purchases - to name a few. 

Oakland and California refused to offer any public money and bragged about it - at least until the last, eleventh hour (and 55 minutes) offer was made to keep the team in Oakland.  Frankly, I'm certain Oakland and the state of California are happier to lose that vicious man's game of NFL football.  Progressives Democrats associate; alcoholism, spousal and family abuse, fanaticism, and other, and worser behaviors with male sporting events.  Truth be told - the City of Oakland, in their minds, believe they will be better off with the Raiders gone.

So, I advise Raider fans living in California to put down the chronic, and focus their anger toward the real villains here - The City of Oakland, and the State of California.  Both entities drove the Raiders away for their own political ends.  They made profit more difficult than needs be.  They refused to share or budge.  Fact is, they are too stupid to admit, (or see) the income generated by the team. Moreover, they are rabidly dedicated to the Marxist future they appear hell bent on installing across the state.

Raider fans should also be more particular when choosing their politicians.  Ultimately, it was those politicians who forced the team to Las Vegas!

Lastly, Silver included this telling factoid in his report.  Silver intimated if Mr. Davis had sold - or gave his team away - to a minority owner - the City of Oakland and the State of California were prepared to help build a new stadium - with public funds I presume.  I''ll defer to the readers to unwind the prejudice and discrimination in that factoid.  

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Democrat Slave Masters

(Long Post) 

The Democrats Party historically, and the current iteration even more, dislike and fear black people - despite what they claim publicly. However, because Democrats need black votes, they are unable to the traditional behaviors displayed when interacting with a political “enemy”. Their relationship with blacks is as uneasy, phony, and contrived as the other relationships Democrats are obliged maintain.  To display an overt allegiance with black voters, Democrats use black people as decorations. They adorn the stage with blacks when they speak as a backdrop, or, whenever a Democrat needs a “color” photo op.  When a Democrat is in trouble politically, they will display inordinate concern and appear often – pretending to care for blacks. This is when they actually touch black people.

Blacks have themselves to blame.  They voluntarily walked into servitude - a permanent dependence upon Democrat “compassion” and policy making. In their various miseries, blacks also provide Democrats a perpetual Crisis. The Democrat Mayor of Chicago, and former Whitehouse Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, said that Democrats “cannot waste a crisis”. For Democrats - Blacks are the crisis that keeps on giving. Despite the quotas, set asides, stipends, and programs given them by Democrats, blacks have not gained control over their lives or advanced out of poverty & crime. Considering the vast opportunities and advantages provided to blacks, they did not achieve academic success, or parity, in the numbers predicted. History suggests racial parity is an unachievable goal. Over 50 years of evidence shows every government program enacted by Democrats to accomplish that goal is an unmitigated failure. That prompted Democrats to expanded dependence policies and programs.

Regardless of the stated concern or purpose, all the programs Democrats create for blacks have a single purpose – BRIBING black votes.

A detail of those actions follows:
Lyndon Baines Johnson, LBJ, the father of the civil rights laws and all the programs that flowed from that legislation, was an Old School Racist from South Texas. He expressed his true feelings to his colleges in 1957 - prior to embarking upon the many civil rights laws that later defined his presidency.

LBJ quipped: “These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us (Democrats) since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again.”

Giving them (blacks) a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference – RE: keep them dependent upon Democrats – is contemporary SLAVERY!

Whether it was the violent oppression of slavery, or, a desire to separate the races, or limit the number of black voters by using poll taxes, or segregation, and/or other ancillary race laws, people must realize and remember all these laws were created and enacted, by DEMOCRATS!   Why they did this is preeminent. Democrats continue to conspire in law making that make blacks dependent, or actions that limit their numbers by ignoring black on black crimes - and an abortion rate over 30%.
LBJ and his Democrat ilk remain fixated upon retaining and expanding the chains of dependency and oppression upon blacks for a reason - Democrats cannot win elections without black support.  LBJ needed a large majority of Democrat voters to enable his Great Society Programs (GSP). The Great Society included handouts to every kind and color of voter. This idiom has not changed. Growing perpetual dependence upon government is the Democrat way. It is essential. 

Conversely, boilerplate Democrat policymaking is so offensive to traditional Americans they stopped competing in the arena of ideas.  Eventually, Democrats were reduced to trolling for votes in areas formerly considered deviant – homosexuality, transsexuals, Et Al. 

At the time of Civil Rights passage, the South was held in firm Democrat control. But the South presented LBJ a problem. LBJ needed Republican votes to overcome the reluctance of the Southern Democrats to pass civil rights and other GSP legislation. Passage of the civil rights laws required white Northern Republicans votes and their Christian values to justify the law. LBJ lied to them.  He never planned to share credit for the civil rights laws. He immediately began framing Republicans as racists once the civil rights laws were enacted. Even though Southern Democrats fought and filibuster the civil rights laws, LBJ declared civil rights was a Democrat accomplishment.

LBJ was a master politician who applied the carrot and stick motivational techniques. Arm twisting it was called. LBJ also kept personal dossiers on congressmen and other bureaucrats. He threatened to expose the unorthodox behaviors of those involved if they refused or vacillated in backing his plans.

Importantly, congressmen from states where the black population was small, had little if any experience with blacks and other minorities. They saw nicely dressed, educated black men like MLK arguing for change. Thurgood Marshall, Adam Clayton Powell, and others appeared and behaved the same as the whites they knew. The notion that skin color alone was holding back honest, hardworking, and industrious members of society was unfair. Thus was the debate was framed when LBJ came calling for support.

Simultaneously, various acts of civil disobedience: sit-ins, peaceful protests, anecdotal examples of earnest black struggles, buckled with a handful of crimes against innocent blacks at the hands of whites in the south, made passage of the civil rights laws near axiomatic once the Republicans were aboard.

Blacks are purposely indoctrinated to be ignorant they owe a large debt of gratitude to white Republicans. They simultaneously ignore facts surrounding civil rights - the original abolitionists were Republicans - Abe Lincoln, who freed the slaves, was Republican. In fact, all the major societal changes that afforded and increased black freedom and access to political power was accomplished with Republicans leading the fight.

Only when illegitimate and racist laws (Affirmative Action) that enabled one group at the expense of another did Republicans balk. It was that refusal Democrats glommed onto to manipulate the black vote. What the Democrat wanted was to tether blacks and other “minority” groups permanently to their party.  LBJ knew blacks well - and what was needed to secure their votes. Give-away programs were specifically designed to lure and secure their enslavement - and votes.

f white Republicans knew what LBJ knew, and planned, the civil rights laws may never have passed. Certainly, the Affirmative Action laws and other black give aways would not be enacted. 

Blacks reveal their attention to the history and facts surrounding slavery by voting for Democrats at rates above 90% in most elections. Obama received 97% of the black vote. Blacks vote for Democrats because Democrats have convinced them that conservatives and Republicans are genetically predisposed to racism. They are taught Republicans are born hating blacks, and that they cannot change. White Republican racism is institutional. Simply being a Republican means a person is a racist at their core.

Many blacks believe this lie.  They go to great lengths to exaggerate and repeat the horrors that Democrats tell them about Republicans. Conservative Republicans are accused of perpetually planning to roll back the clock on civil rights, and re-establish segregation for blacks – or worse!!!  If ever they have a chance.

Black refuse to acknowledge Democrats were the party who developed segregation and applied it with force using the KKK. Why blacks refuse to acknowledge this reality is revealing.  Blacks adhere blindly to what Democrats tell them about Republicans and never question what Democrats say because they play to the worst and most simpleminded fear tactics. Even when it can be shown that Republicans worked towards, and voted for, initiating and expanding their civil rights and freedoms, blacks continue to refuse to acknowledge what Republicans did for them. Blacks refuse to vote Republican.

LBJ also knew a secret - blacks are primarily focused upon envy and hatred of whites. He knew some blacks wanted paybacks – and the means to do as little as possible, yet live a middle class life - reparations. That is what Democrats attempt to give them. Blacks are not really interested in equality. Blacks want to be exempted from the sacrifice and long-term requirements of success. Immediate and easy rewards are more popular and important. Blacks also want to punish whites - even Democrats. Seeing whites suffer - even by blacks who have never experienced segregation, let alone slavery - is proof the focus upon past discrimination is well alive and directing the actions of blacks.

Getting a quality education is universally recognized as a basic rudiment for any person to improve themselves. School vouchers and school choice is a Republican program with a large potential upside. The program is proven to work, at least somewhat - where and whenever it is applied. Washington, DC had that program until Obama arrived. One of his first acts was abolishing the voucher program - to reward the teacher’s union (NEA) for their support. It is more important to Democrats that the NEA face no competition. The NEA have failed whenever they do face competition – hence their desire to eliminate it. Moreover, the NEA fail even without competition - the failed results of their efforts are perpetually in the news. Serial failures are reason enough for Democrats to keep promoting the NEA. Curiously, a lack of money is always the excuse used for the failures.

IF the NEA were the best organization available to teach children, they would welcome competition - to prove once and forever, how much better they are. They would open a can of teachers’ Whoop-ass and show the parents and the nation how good they are. They haven't. They won't. They can’t.

Increasing dollars spent, reducing class sizes, building prettier schools, adding computers and other technologies, and making certain that no victim group is excluded or marginalized in anyway – that everyone has exactly everything they need to learn… hasn’t changed the pitiful outcomes from their teaching product. The NEA outcomes have gotten worse – much worse, in fact. In many urban centers, under 20% of students graduate. Repeat that... less than 20% graduate! Nationwide, less than 40% of blacks students graduate.

Let's frame that: black parents continue to reward Democrat politicians for dooming their children to ignorance, ignorance is causal for poverty, and all the other behaviors that innate stupidity spawns. Stupidity negatively affect a person their entire lives. Stupid behaviors compound the problems faced and behaviors chosen.

Have a child out of wedlock - 90% will remain in poverty the duration of their lives.

Black children are born out of wedlock over 70% of the time. That means that over 70% of black children grow up with no father. Statistics show children with no father in the home are doomed to poverty. Traditionally, fathers ostensibly focus upon discipline, and stand to protect their children. These fatherly factors enable a child to relax and feel protected. Father’s motivate children to practice self-control, study, and to scrape and claw their way to the child’s potential. Fathers know how a lack of education hampers and harms a child’s professional options and incomes – usually because the father knows this reality first hand. Two parents in the home is vital to any child’s success, financial viability, and well rounded development.

Now refer back to LBJ’s comments above. Democrats, when writing the welfare laws in the 1960s made certain that no black man (father) resided with (his “Wife”) in any government subsidized housing. That might prove unsettling and provide black families and children too much of an advantage in the minds of Democrats. Recall… LBJ wanted just enough to quiet them down… not enough to make a real difference…

Now deceased, NY, Senator Dan Patrick Moynihan was an old school Democrat. Dan actually thought for himself. Moynihan accurately predicted this deplorable outcome for black children.  But a majority of Democrats wanted the LBJ policies. Welfare was structured to pay for children and the mother – solely. A welfare system designed to pay for head counts on children led many black women to bear more children - to increase their monthly incomes. Unbelievably, no penalty for creating more mouths to feed while receiving public assistance was ever enacted.

Since welfare laws effectively outlawed black marriage - many black women chose a government stipend over relying upon spousal support. In truth, Democrat policies prevented the father being in the home. That led to non-traditional families - children were born to women who mated with multiple fathers.  Currently no penalties for indiscriminate procreation exist. It is common for black women to bear children from numerous fathers. Few black children have any paternal blood tie to their siblings. Many have half-siblings in other families. That made a problem for Democrats. Democrat had to excuse the absent father and the mother's behaviors.

The penalty of racism was nebulously defined so Democrats could use the racist accusation to silence complaints.

The advent of the birth control pill, and subsequent passing of abortion laws, allowed women to experiment with sex without consequence. So long as women managed their contraception device and ignored any resident morality conflict, women could audition their potential/replacement spouse and avoid pregnancy. The effect these behaviors had upon a child's morality and sense of security was never considered. The abortion law enabled women even more flexibility. They could terminate a troublesome pregnancy and retain the professional and personal options – just like homosexuals.   
Democrats saw another crisis – an opportunity for female dependence.  They created the Women’s Movement and became the surrogate father/provider for single, female headed households.

Democrats next used the Liberal judges to change any law that couldn’t withstand the legislative process/light of day – abortion is a classic example. In a few short years, any woman who wanted to divorce her spouse, regardless of cause or fault, was axiomatically granted custody of the children; a state subsidy for each child; a child support order for the father; and, copious perks and benefits the government provided to assure dependence and Democrat voter loyalty.

Democrats rewarded any choice that advanced the secular, non-traditional family model of a fatherless, and Godless, household. This is the choice favored by atheists, feminists, and the other constituents in the Democrat tent. Women flocked to the new, empowering, life enhancing, single mother led household model. That model removed the annoyance of controlling, stupid husbands/men - coupled with the ridicule of God and religion. Women were finally FREE from the yoke of God, matrimony, chastity, sexual fidelity, and, the oppressive, authoritative demands of a husband in the traditional, two-parent, family model that religion proscribed.

Blacks are the largest group using federal dollars and programs to abort their children. If not for the introduction of abortion in 1973, the population of blacks would be 50% greater today. This is what Democrats term: "A Good Start".

A black male child living in an urban environment has a one in four chance of reaching the age 25. Criminal violence and ancillary components of crime are causal for the unbelievable number of deaths. Democrats speak little about these crimes. Other blacks murder their racial kinsmen by a margin over 90%. Democrats responded to these horrific statistics by developing Hate Crimes. This did it to shift the attention and responsibility away from Democrat politicians, the black community who do the murdering, and place blame at the feet of whites/Republicans.

White conservatives are the go-to villain; accused and blamed for all bad things that happen to black people.

Blacks never consider that many Democrats view black on black murders of young urban men as Late-Term Abortions. They must. Democrats DO NOTHING to arrest the behaviors, or provide blacks with critical oversight and discipline to lead them away from crime.

The best option is offering black parents a choice in who teaches their children and refusing to condone the "cultural" elements of learning used to excuse academic under performance. Democrats ignore the claims by some blacks that academic and frugal behaviors that lead to success are "white" behaviors. That makes shunning learning an acceptable option. It's also an example of Democrat pandering. Fostering the belief that racial stereotypes held by blacks are real and no amount of effort will overcome them - is precisely what the Democrat wants blacks to believe.

Evidence that proves that Democrats have systematically worked to ensure that blacks remain an underclass and deny them access to the tools they might use to climb out of the ghettos, has NOT resulted in any change in voting behaviors among blacks. The majority of blacks continue to vote Democrat no matter how copious, damning, or pervasive the information regarding the Democrat’s motives and actions that harm blacks. Black racial stereotypes and selfishness align with Democrat lies. Adopting self destructive behaviors, relying upon the Democrat stipend, and blaming others for their plight defines the idiom. Blacks re-elect the likes of Marion Barry – a convicted coke addict and a very corrupt politician, repeatedly - ignoring his behaviors. Barry was re-elected because he feeds the flames of racial division that blacks cannot trust whites - and he promised more giveaways. Allegiance to skin color, and politics that excuse and reward dysgenic behaviors, matter more than credibility, personal responsibility and honesty. The promise of “free money" taken from the wallets of white people is what many blacks prefer.

Despite a long history of Democrat behaviors and designed outcomes that reveal white Democrats detest blacks - and evidence these Democrats refuse to live next to blacks, or send their children to black schools, blacks refuse to question the Democrat's motives. Democrats live in fear of an angry minority mugging them, or their wife or family, or…, burning down the neighborhood; rioting and looting. Democrats have created a separate (but equal) set of laws that keep blacks at a safe distance from themselves.

Democrats never let on that black life is exactly how the Democrat panned, how they want black people - uneducated, poor, dependent, hopeless and hate-filled. 50 years of Democrat programs have made life for blacks worse... just like LBJ promised... just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a real difference.