Tuesday, March 28, 2017

White Discrimination - The city of Oakland & State of California

NFL reporter Mike Silver scribed a sniveling short story about the selfish, callous, and unfairness displayed by the NFL's Oakland Raider owner, Mark Davis.  Silver goes off the rails describing the "blue collar" make up of Oakland and how these long suffering fans were held hostage by Raider ownership and ultimately betrayed - twice! Without using the word, Silver made it very apparent owner Davis's GREED was at the heart of the move. Heartless profit and a disregard for the fans were the pivotal elements prompting Davis to move the team.  Pffft!  What rot! Boo hoo!  Raider fans should be mad at the City of Oakland and the State of California.  The Davis family have been at least as patient as Job trying to get a new stadium.

Let's examine a few salient issues regarding Oakland, California, the fans, and Vegas.
California state sales tax = 13.5%.
The Oakland coliseum was in bad repair in the 1970s.  I used to attend games and other events there.  AL Davis, Mark's father, asked for a new stadium in the later 1970s.  His request was blown off.  Steadily, the coliseum began to degrade in earnest as politicians facing "competing demands" differed coliseum revenues to other areas.

We can now add DANGEROUS to the list of adjectives describing the coliseum.  Its a dangerous and dirty building, located in the midst of those "blue collar" fans -  it is in one of the most crime laden areas of Oakland. The Lockwood Gardens Public Housing Authority sits a couple blocks from the coliseum.  Trulia shows a Bright RED color for the number and variety of crimes surrounding the coliseum.

Know too, when the Raiders returned from L.A. they signed a lease with the City of Oakland for three years.  Oakland raised the lease rates even though the agreement made no provisions for the increase.  The city of Oakland had the Raiders by the short hairs and sought to leverage and profit from them - legalities be damned.  The city raised the lease rate five times in next 14 years.  Not surprisingly, little to NONE of the increase revenues went to repairs or good maintenance of the coliseum.  The city and state politicians spent that extra revenue doing what all Democrat politicians do - bribing votes.

Grass Valley is a few miles south of Oakland.  The Zoo is there - as is  the large infrastructure mains required for new developments. Grass Valley has many many acres of public lands wasting away - save for the obligatory windmill farms the state is obsessed to install when ever they see a vacant pasture.  Grass Valley is a good location for a new stadium and I'm certain that location was at least mentioned. Offering a good deal on the public lands would likely kept the Raiders near Oakland.  Alternatively, If the team located over the Altamount Pass - near Livingston - that location remains close and it is primarily open range land - dotted with windmills.

Be aware Mark Davis is obligated to pay the first half a billion dollars for the new Vegas site.  He is invested. IMPORTANTLY - Davis loses that money regardless of any unforeseen bad outcome.  Yes, Vegas offered the team public funds too.  The "public" benefits from the TAX DOLLARS paid by the team - anyone want to guess at that amount of money?  Businesses too benefit from the team in parasitizing off the team - hotels, food, ancillary purchases - to name a few. 

Oakland and California refused to offer any public money and bragged about it - at least until the last, eleventh hour (and 55 minutes) offer was made to keep the team in Oakland.  Frankly, I'm certain Oakland and the state of California are happier to lose that vicious man's game of NFL football.  Progressives Democrats associate; alcoholism, spousal and family abuse, fanaticism, and other, and worser behaviors with male sporting events.  Truth be told - the City of Oakland, in their minds, believe they will be better off with the Raiders gone.

So, I advise Raider fans living in California to put down the chronic, and focus their anger toward the real villains here - The City of Oakland, and the State of California.  Both entities drove the Raiders away for their own political ends.  They made profit more difficult than needs be.  They refused to share or budge.  Fact is, they are too stupid to admit, (or see) the income generated by the team. Moreover, they are rabidly dedicated to the Marxist future they appear hell bent on installing across the state.

Raider fans should also be more particular when choosing their politicians.  Ultimately, it was those politicians who forced the team to Las Vegas!

Lastly, Silver included this telling factoid in his report.  Silver intimated if Mr. Davis had sold - or gave his team away - to a minority owner - the City of Oakland and the State of California were prepared to help build a new stadium - with public funds I presume.  I''ll defer to the readers to unwind the prejudice and discrimination in that factoid.  

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Democrat Slave Masters

(Long Post) 

The Democrats Party historically, and the current iteration even more, dislike and fear black people - despite what they claim publicly. However, because Democrats need black votes, they are unable to the traditional behaviors displayed when interacting with a political “enemy”. Their relationship with blacks is as uneasy, phony, and contrived as the other relationships Democrats are obliged maintain.  To display an overt allegiance with black voters, Democrats use black people as decorations. They adorn the stage with blacks when they speak as a backdrop, or, whenever a Democrat needs a “color” photo op.  When a Democrat is in trouble politically, they will display inordinate concern and appear often – pretending to care for blacks. This is when they actually touch black people.

Blacks have themselves to blame.  They voluntarily walked into servitude - a permanent dependence upon Democrat “compassion” and policy making. In their various miseries, blacks also provide Democrats a perpetual Crisis. The Democrat Mayor of Chicago, and former Whitehouse Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, said that Democrats “cannot waste a crisis”. For Democrats - Blacks are the crisis that keeps on giving. Despite the quotas, set asides, stipends, and programs given them by Democrats, blacks have not gained control over their lives or advanced out of poverty & crime. Considering the vast opportunities and advantages provided to blacks, they did not achieve academic success, or parity, in the numbers predicted. History suggests racial parity is an unachievable goal. Over 50 years of evidence shows every government program enacted by Democrats to accomplish that goal is an unmitigated failure. That prompted Democrats to expanded dependence policies and programs.

Regardless of the stated concern or purpose, all the programs Democrats create for blacks have a single purpose – BRIBING black votes.

A detail of those actions follows:
Lyndon Baines Johnson, LBJ, the father of the civil rights laws and all the programs that flowed from that legislation, was an Old School Racist from South Texas. He expressed his true feelings to his colleges in 1957 - prior to embarking upon the many civil rights laws that later defined his presidency.

LBJ quipped: “These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us (Democrats) since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again.”

Giving them (blacks) a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference – RE: keep them dependent upon Democrats – is contemporary SLAVERY!

Whether it was the violent oppression of slavery, or, a desire to separate the races, or limit the number of black voters by using poll taxes, or segregation, and/or other ancillary race laws, people must realize and remember all these laws were created and enacted, by DEMOCRATS!   Why they did this is preeminent. Democrats continue to conspire in law making that make blacks dependent, or actions that limit their numbers by ignoring black on black crimes - and an abortion rate over 30%.
LBJ and his Democrat ilk remain fixated upon retaining and expanding the chains of dependency and oppression upon blacks for a reason - Democrats cannot win elections without black support.  LBJ needed a large majority of Democrat voters to enable his Great Society Programs (GSP). The Great Society included handouts to every kind and color of voter. This idiom has not changed. Growing perpetual dependence upon government is the Democrat way. It is essential. 

Conversely, boilerplate Democrat policymaking is so offensive to traditional Americans they stopped competing in the arena of ideas.  Eventually, Democrats were reduced to trolling for votes in areas formerly considered deviant – homosexuality, transsexuals, Et Al. 

At the time of Civil Rights passage, the South was held in firm Democrat control. But the South presented LBJ a problem. LBJ needed Republican votes to overcome the reluctance of the Southern Democrats to pass civil rights and other GSP legislation. Passage of the civil rights laws required white Northern Republicans votes and their Christian values to justify the law. LBJ lied to them.  He never planned to share credit for the civil rights laws. He immediately began framing Republicans as racists once the civil rights laws were enacted. Even though Southern Democrats fought and filibuster the civil rights laws, LBJ declared civil rights was a Democrat accomplishment.

LBJ was a master politician who applied the carrot and stick motivational techniques. Arm twisting it was called. LBJ also kept personal dossiers on congressmen and other bureaucrats. He threatened to expose the unorthodox behaviors of those involved if they refused or vacillated in backing his plans.

Importantly, congressmen from states where the black population was small, had little if any experience with blacks and other minorities. They saw nicely dressed, educated black men like MLK arguing for change. Thurgood Marshall, Adam Clayton Powell, and others appeared and behaved the same as the whites they knew. The notion that skin color alone was holding back honest, hardworking, and industrious members of society was unfair. Thus was the debate was framed when LBJ came calling for support.

Simultaneously, various acts of civil disobedience: sit-ins, peaceful protests, anecdotal examples of earnest black struggles, buckled with a handful of crimes against innocent blacks at the hands of whites in the south, made passage of the civil rights laws near axiomatic once the Republicans were aboard.

Blacks are purposely indoctrinated to be ignorant they owe a large debt of gratitude to white Republicans. They simultaneously ignore facts surrounding civil rights - the original abolitionists were Republicans - Abe Lincoln, who freed the slaves, was Republican. In fact, all the major societal changes that afforded and increased black freedom and access to political power was accomplished with Republicans leading the fight.

Only when illegitimate and racist laws (Affirmative Action) that enabled one group at the expense of another did Republicans balk. It was that refusal Democrats glommed onto to manipulate the black vote. What the Democrat wanted was to tether blacks and other “minority” groups permanently to their party.  LBJ knew blacks well - and what was needed to secure their votes. Give-away programs were specifically designed to lure and secure their enslavement - and votes.

f white Republicans knew what LBJ knew, and planned, the civil rights laws may never have passed. Certainly, the Affirmative Action laws and other black give aways would not be enacted. 

Blacks reveal their attention to the history and facts surrounding slavery by voting for Democrats at rates above 90% in most elections. Obama received 97% of the black vote. Blacks vote for Democrats because Democrats have convinced them that conservatives and Republicans are genetically predisposed to racism. They are taught Republicans are born hating blacks, and that they cannot change. White Republican racism is institutional. Simply being a Republican means a person is a racist at their core.

Many blacks believe this lie.  They go to great lengths to exaggerate and repeat the horrors that Democrats tell them about Republicans. Conservative Republicans are accused of perpetually planning to roll back the clock on civil rights, and re-establish segregation for blacks – or worse!!!  If ever they have a chance.

Black refuse to acknowledge Democrats were the party who developed segregation and applied it with force using the KKK. Why blacks refuse to acknowledge this reality is revealing.  Blacks adhere blindly to what Democrats tell them about Republicans and never question what Democrats say because they play to the worst and most simpleminded fear tactics. Even when it can be shown that Republicans worked towards, and voted for, initiating and expanding their civil rights and freedoms, blacks continue to refuse to acknowledge what Republicans did for them. Blacks refuse to vote Republican.

LBJ also knew a secret - blacks are primarily focused upon envy and hatred of whites. He knew some blacks wanted paybacks – and the means to do as little as possible, yet live a middle class life - reparations. That is what Democrats attempt to give them. Blacks are not really interested in equality. Blacks want to be exempted from the sacrifice and long-term requirements of success. Immediate and easy rewards are more popular and important. Blacks also want to punish whites - even Democrats. Seeing whites suffer - even by blacks who have never experienced segregation, let alone slavery - is proof the focus upon past discrimination is well alive and directing the actions of blacks.

Getting a quality education is universally recognized as a basic rudiment for any person to improve themselves. School vouchers and school choice is a Republican program with a large potential upside. The program is proven to work, at least somewhat - where and whenever it is applied. Washington, DC had that program until Obama arrived. One of his first acts was abolishing the voucher program - to reward the teacher’s union (NEA) for their support. It is more important to Democrats that the NEA face no competition. The NEA have failed whenever they do face competition – hence their desire to eliminate it. Moreover, the NEA fail even without competition - the failed results of their efforts are perpetually in the news. Serial failures are reason enough for Democrats to keep promoting the NEA. Curiously, a lack of money is always the excuse used for the failures.

IF the NEA were the best organization available to teach children, they would welcome competition - to prove once and forever, how much better they are. They would open a can of teachers’ Whoop-ass and show the parents and the nation how good they are. They haven't. They won't. They can’t.

Increasing dollars spent, reducing class sizes, building prettier schools, adding computers and other technologies, and making certain that no victim group is excluded or marginalized in anyway – that everyone has exactly everything they need to learn… hasn’t changed the pitiful outcomes from their teaching product. The NEA outcomes have gotten worse – much worse, in fact. In many urban centers, under 20% of students graduate. Repeat that... less than 20% graduate! Nationwide, less than 40% of blacks students graduate.

Let's frame that: black parents continue to reward Democrat politicians for dooming their children to ignorance, ignorance is causal for poverty, and all the other behaviors that innate stupidity spawns. Stupidity negatively affect a person their entire lives. Stupid behaviors compound the problems faced and behaviors chosen.

Have a child out of wedlock - 90% will remain in poverty the duration of their lives.

Black children are born out of wedlock over 70% of the time. That means that over 70% of black children grow up with no father. Statistics show children with no father in the home are doomed to poverty. Traditionally, fathers ostensibly focus upon discipline, and stand to protect their children. These fatherly factors enable a child to relax and feel protected. Father’s motivate children to practice self-control, study, and to scrape and claw their way to the child’s potential. Fathers know how a lack of education hampers and harms a child’s professional options and incomes – usually because the father knows this reality first hand. Two parents in the home is vital to any child’s success, financial viability, and well rounded development.

Now refer back to LBJ’s comments above. Democrats, when writing the welfare laws in the 1960s made certain that no black man (father) resided with (his “Wife”) in any government subsidized housing. That might prove unsettling and provide black families and children too much of an advantage in the minds of Democrats. Recall… LBJ wanted just enough to quiet them down… not enough to make a real difference…

Now deceased, NY, Senator Dan Patrick Moynihan was an old school Democrat. Dan actually thought for himself. Moynihan accurately predicted this deplorable outcome for black children.  But a majority of Democrats wanted the LBJ policies. Welfare was structured to pay for children and the mother – solely. A welfare system designed to pay for head counts on children led many black women to bear more children - to increase their monthly incomes. Unbelievably, no penalty for creating more mouths to feed while receiving public assistance was ever enacted.

Since welfare laws effectively outlawed black marriage - many black women chose a government stipend over relying upon spousal support. In truth, Democrat policies prevented the father being in the home. That led to non-traditional families - children were born to women who mated with multiple fathers.  Currently no penalties for indiscriminate procreation exist. It is common for black women to bear children from numerous fathers. Few black children have any paternal blood tie to their siblings. Many have half-siblings in other families. That made a problem for Democrats. Democrat had to excuse the absent father and the mother's behaviors.

The penalty of racism was nebulously defined so Democrats could use the racist accusation to silence complaints.

The advent of the birth control pill, and subsequent passing of abortion laws, allowed women to experiment with sex without consequence. So long as women managed their contraception device and ignored any resident morality conflict, women could audition their potential/replacement spouse and avoid pregnancy. The effect these behaviors had upon a child's morality and sense of security was never considered. The abortion law enabled women even more flexibility. They could terminate a troublesome pregnancy and retain the professional and personal options – just like homosexuals.   
Democrats saw another crisis – an opportunity for female dependence.  They created the Women’s Movement and became the surrogate father/provider for single, female headed households.

Democrats next used the Liberal judges to change any law that couldn’t withstand the legislative process/light of day – abortion is a classic example. In a few short years, any woman who wanted to divorce her spouse, regardless of cause or fault, was axiomatically granted custody of the children; a state subsidy for each child; a child support order for the father; and, copious perks and benefits the government provided to assure dependence and Democrat voter loyalty.

Democrats rewarded any choice that advanced the secular, non-traditional family model of a fatherless, and Godless, household. This is the choice favored by atheists, feminists, and the other constituents in the Democrat tent. Women flocked to the new, empowering, life enhancing, single mother led household model. That model removed the annoyance of controlling, stupid husbands/men - coupled with the ridicule of God and religion. Women were finally FREE from the yoke of God, matrimony, chastity, sexual fidelity, and, the oppressive, authoritative demands of a husband in the traditional, two-parent, family model that religion proscribed.

Blacks are the largest group using federal dollars and programs to abort their children. If not for the introduction of abortion in 1973, the population of blacks would be 50% greater today. This is what Democrats term: "A Good Start".

A black male child living in an urban environment has a one in four chance of reaching the age 25. Criminal violence and ancillary components of crime are causal for the unbelievable number of deaths. Democrats speak little about these crimes. Other blacks murder their racial kinsmen by a margin over 90%. Democrats responded to these horrific statistics by developing Hate Crimes. This did it to shift the attention and responsibility away from Democrat politicians, the black community who do the murdering, and place blame at the feet of whites/Republicans.

White conservatives are the go-to villain; accused and blamed for all bad things that happen to black people.

Blacks never consider that many Democrats view black on black murders of young urban men as Late-Term Abortions. They must. Democrats DO NOTHING to arrest the behaviors, or provide blacks with critical oversight and discipline to lead them away from crime.

The best option is offering black parents a choice in who teaches their children and refusing to condone the "cultural" elements of learning used to excuse academic under performance. Democrats ignore the claims by some blacks that academic and frugal behaviors that lead to success are "white" behaviors. That makes shunning learning an acceptable option. It's also an example of Democrat pandering. Fostering the belief that racial stereotypes held by blacks are real and no amount of effort will overcome them - is precisely what the Democrat wants blacks to believe.

Evidence that proves that Democrats have systematically worked to ensure that blacks remain an underclass and deny them access to the tools they might use to climb out of the ghettos, has NOT resulted in any change in voting behaviors among blacks. The majority of blacks continue to vote Democrat no matter how copious, damning, or pervasive the information regarding the Democrat’s motives and actions that harm blacks. Black racial stereotypes and selfishness align with Democrat lies. Adopting self destructive behaviors, relying upon the Democrat stipend, and blaming others for their plight defines the idiom. Blacks re-elect the likes of Marion Barry – a convicted coke addict and a very corrupt politician, repeatedly - ignoring his behaviors. Barry was re-elected because he feeds the flames of racial division that blacks cannot trust whites - and he promised more giveaways. Allegiance to skin color, and politics that excuse and reward dysgenic behaviors, matter more than credibility, personal responsibility and honesty. The promise of “free money" taken from the wallets of white people is what many blacks prefer.

Despite a long history of Democrat behaviors and designed outcomes that reveal white Democrats detest blacks - and evidence these Democrats refuse to live next to blacks, or send their children to black schools, blacks refuse to question the Democrat's motives. Democrats live in fear of an angry minority mugging them, or their wife or family, or…, burning down the neighborhood; rioting and looting. Democrats have created a separate (but equal) set of laws that keep blacks at a safe distance from themselves.

Democrats never let on that black life is exactly how the Democrat panned, how they want black people - uneducated, poor, dependent, hopeless and hate-filled. 50 years of Democrat programs have made life for blacks worse... just like LBJ promised... just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a real difference.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

You are NORMAL and there are millions like you

It is past time Blue Collar White Christian Males, BCWCM, reclaim the place they earned in society.  Earned! They must act to repeal laws that directly discriminate against them and their Constitutionally ordered rights. In fact, per the 1964 Civil Rights Law, many of "actions" enacted to artificially elevate, qualify, and protect persons of a different race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual behavior are not only unfair, they are illegal. These practices also place unqualified people in positions of authority where their decision making and physical limitations jeopardize the life and limbs of their fellow workers the people they are charged to help. United, and inspired to action, BCWCMs  have the ability to change these patently prejudicial and onerous laws.  You have a responsibility to act.  America needs you now more than ever.

Please realize you are not an odd-ball. Nor are you alone. The majority of America is just like you.  America is more similar to you than you think. There are more BCWCMs than the Progressive press wants you to believe. 

For all intents and purposes, the media is a monolithic monopoly. They speak with one voice and assault the viewer/listener with a constant barrage of lies, half-truths, and purposely damning information about you and others like you. Did you know the media has daily conference calls with top Democrat politicians?  It's true.  They regularly collude to your detriment.  Why do they do this?  Why do Progressives insult you and demean you chosen behaviors = normal behaviors?  They fear you!!!  They know the power you hold.  They must compartmentalize and limit your power.  They must paint you as a dim-witted (or insane, deplorable) pariah with evil intention.  The media and those like them really are mentally ill.

You think you are powerless don't you?  You've heard the media again and again denounce you alongside a report that you're an out of touch, dying breed, that must be punished for their thoughts and actions - AND - the thoughts and actions of their fore bearers. They majority never saw a slave or persecuted other Americans.  They were working to assimilate.  

You're afraid too... admit it, you are and should be afraid.  You've seen and heard what happens to the racist.  Racist, per the Democrat definition, is a white male.  Yep, that's the extent of it.  Any white male who has the temerity to claim his Constitutional rights or demand an equal playing field - according to Democrat Party policy - is a racist that must be punished.  Job loss, loss of promotions, and other punitive actions in a zero tolerance environment ought to scare you.  That is why uniting with your racial kinsmen is essential.  You act in unison.  Since Democrats have grouped you, act as a group - always.  The group immediately asserts more power and influence than you can alone.  Inform every member of your group to never be attacked alone.  No one may act alone, or be isolated and bullied alone.  Assure, as far as possible to verify each member is genuine and not a Democrat spy.  You can do this.  

Democrats - what prompts their goals - fear and absolute control.  


Half of all eligible voters DO NOT Vote.  You can investigate and discover why, but I already have.  I asked white Christian males why they don't vote.  I also investigated the percentage not voting.  Round numbers - 40 million white males do not vote.  40 MILLION!  Add their wives = 80 million!!! 

There is a direct correlate and reasons WHY white males are disinterested in politics.  Look above...  they've been convinced they are a small group with no power to change what they consider unfair and punitive.  Others buy into the guilt of past racial sins.  They all think there is no difference between the political parties Republican and Democrat - they are correct in their assessment.  Neither party will represent their desires - an end to affirmative action and other race laws.  They want fairness and a level playing field.  Political leaders refuse to act because they also fear being attacked and labeled a racist.  

Approximately 126 million votes were cast in the 2012 election.  65 million Democrat, 61 million Republican.  4 million votes turned the election.  

If half of these male votes are marshaled - 20 million - the political impact will not be ignored. If half their wives vote - 40 million - will terrify politicians from both parties.  The wishes of these white male voting group will be addressed; fast!  The political landscape will change immediately.  The numbers of Progressives/Liberals will become exposed as the minuscule minority it is.  Politicians will act, and that will be the first step in re-making America, an America where all men are treated equally.  

The politicians opposing this voting bloc's wishes are finished.  White male votes can also influence several urban areas that are considered permanent Democrat strong holds. 

Unity is essential.

Some may be concerned these changes will undue the advancement of minorities. No, they won't.  Everyone will be measured equally - by merit.  That is as fair as it can get.  There are sound reasons why this must be repaired.  As mentioned above, having unqualified people in positions of authority, or where life and limb are endangered - is destructive, dangerous - and stupid!  Only an idiot would ask for the problems these decisions invite - see: mental illness. Segregation laws lasted 60 years.  The civil rights laws were enacted in 1964 - fifty years. If people can gain opportunity by hard work and effort - they have and will.  And, resetting the law will not preclude anyone from anything - save physical size and weight restrictions - that cuts in every direction.  

Slavery ended over 150 years ago.  Virtually no one alive today had a family member engaged in slavery.  Many had ancestors who were slaves themselves - indentured servants and apprentices were in fact slaves to the wishes of their masters.  The majority moved west and scraped a life for their families and had nothing to do with slaves or racial issues.  Blaming white males collectively for slavery is a bizarre and destructive plan to limit the political power and influence of white males.  It requires a vast collusion in every facet of life to accomplish this design.  Destroying it will not be easy.  However, millions of votes will move politicians to act, or remove them from office.  

More in the next blog on HOW to form a group and get them to the polls and vote.  

Friday, July 15, 2016

Dead Baby with Doll

Kudos to the New York Post for putting this image of the dead child on the front page today.

I encourage Trump to use it ubiquitously and hang it around the necks of Obama and Hillary... and Bill Clinton. I hope readers recall Bill refused to take Bin Laden into custody when handed to him on a silver platter. That's a documented fact.  Bill could have prevented 9/11 - but choose another path. There was a reason for his action to not acquire Osama Bin Laden.  The reason follows.

Also recall also the Benghazi compound and the Ambassador who dies there. After Obama policy decisions destabilized the region by removing the regimes that provided a modicum of peace there, Hillary acted to cover their tracks.  Hillary and Obama purposely refused cries for more security from Ambassador Stephens and others.  They refused the security even after the terrorists drove a truck through the compound wall - Sounding familiar?

Obama out right refuses to act to eradicate ISIS, place blame for terror where it belongs, or mouth the appropriate words describing what Islamic extremists do and why.  Remember his comments - ISIS is the JV Team remark?

What was Stephens doing in Benghazi, a known violent, unstable area anyway?  Psssst! He was actually brokering weapons to the locals - the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS? Al Qaeda? et al . He was murdered in aa PROTESTS.  Moreover, Obama's reluctance was so rigid he had staff create the lie about the video causing the "Protest" that killed Stephens.  Obama would not name it or cast blame.  What was he and Hillary protecting?  Why was he protecting it? Recall Hillary took globs of cash for the Clinton Foundation in that area too! What was she protecting - using her office?

Let's begin to examine my OPINIONs -

Democrats refuse to do anything negative (past condemning and standing in solidarity) to stop Islamic terror - OR - inner city/BLM acts of terror.  There is a reason for Democrat silence and refusal to act.  This behavior is not new.  The very same behavior was used over 100 years ago to accomplish the same goals by Democrats.  The KKK was once their Terror Wing.  Woodrow Wilson also used the government to silence his detractors with laws that made it crime to criticize his actions - by word or print.  Advocating violence to intimidate US citizens, AND, create a crisis to exploit are now a plank in the Democrat Party platform.  Inner city and Islamic violence form the twin wings of terror fro Democrats.

Why is nothing is done to end inner city black on black violence? The reason is simple.  Black are in the tank politically for Democrat.  They vote over 95% for Democrats. Additionally, the welfare etc. hand outs and policies that make blacks dependent on Democrats prevent blacks from securing control over their lives.  Some blacks prefer the handouts.  Many don't.  But that side issue is immaterial - because Democrats don't care about the deaths in the inner city or the violence.  They WANT and NEED the violence. It assures black dependence on Democrats/gov't and adds chaos to their lives.  The law abiding black living there are more frightened and unable to change their lives because groups like BLM actions result in less police involvement.  Cops refuse to risk much in areas where they are Not WANTED!  BLM assures cops do less to stop lawlessness in the black neighborhoods. Blacks may not like to face the statistics, but they reveal another problems Democrats refuse to correct. Black people inordinately commit more crimes than any other race.  Following the clues to solve a crime (Profiling) is the standard and most effective legal practice.  Black buying a name brand anything also PROFILE.  Its the same thing.  Blacks must STOP listening to Democrats who, by the inactions, don't care if you're dead, or live in terror.  Middle class blacks must Make a FIST!  It is past time to stop fleeing from your racial kinsmen.  A sad reality is this - ALL blacks behaved better, and a greater majority obtained the basics for success in life - graduate high school, get married, get a job, and the BIGGY - fewer illegitimate childbirths!!!!  WHY did Democrats make it a law forbidding black fathers from being in the home with their children and wife to be eligible for welfare?

Ditto Islamic Terror.

The Poor Gays who have given money, their time, energy and worked to secure Democrat politicians election victories, and in everyday behaved like good Democrat soldiers - were discarded like a used condom when Democrats faced a choice after Orlando. Stand up for Gays - OR - protect Muslim violence.  The decision came less than one week after Orlando for Obama and Hillary and other Democrats (and the Legacy news). The combined to attack Trump over "dangerous" rhetoric and Islamaphobia - Trumps pledge to ending the lawless immigration and deporting risky people is over the top - per Democrat policy.  Democrats refused, they could not, or would not even say the words - Islamic Extremist.  Sorry Gay people.  Your LGBT group leaders will also betray you, your lives, and your liberties.  They will side with Democrats.  If another terrorist acts to kill more homos - the results will remain the same. Gays must get used to it, or change your lives - become conservatives.  You have much more in common with Christians than Democrats.  Christians don't like your sexual behaviors - but they will not betray you. They may ask or act to help change sexual behaviors but won't discard you. Now is the time for Gays to ask themselves - which is worse - the group who philosophically disagree with you, or, the group (Democrats) who support and protect a group who will act to kill you ALL?

How do you like it Gay People?  Are you pleased with your reward for diligently supporting Democrats?

What about you responsible Black people?  Are you happy and content with the Black Lives Matter people being coddled and endorsed - even by the NAACP - so your neighborhoods have even less protection/law enforcement?

Do you not see what is in play?

Both black inner city and islamic violence are protected because they provide Democrats benefits. Both groups violence scares people. Both provide a crisis to exploit. Both groups acts of violence are the gift that keeps on giving in the Democrat view.  Why?  The violence intimidates the law abiding. Democrats hope the violence intimidates them - to freely exchange liberties and pay more taxes for Government Protection.  That is precisely what the MOB does - extort payment for protection.  There is difference however.  At least the MOB delivers on their protection promise.  Democrats do nothing.  They want and need the violence to control minds and policy.Gaining permanent control of government is their ONLY ambition and they will create and suffer collateral damage to so do.  What was the Democrat response one-week after Orlando?

Advocating more gun controls is the Democrat official response.  Huh?!!  Seriously?

Crushing the violence and punishing the people involved will not be forthcoming as long as Democrat politicians are not evicted from office.  Term Limits are needed for BOTH PARTIES!!!  Since they will never enact a law that limits their time in office, voting them out of office is the current task.  The Communist wing is current in control of the Democrat Party - by any means necessary... Yes, IMO they will willing sacrifice you to obtain that goal.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Chapter One

Chapter I


Each religion defines the divine, their God(s) differently.  The structure of the divine, God, enjoys no consensus.  Those definitions are traditionally derived from scriptures or similar scribed references.  The reference(s) each religion utilizes predicates the number of Gods, their authority, dominion, and abilities.  Christianity recognizes at least two Gods – the God of the Old Testament and Jesus Christ.  Hindus recognize scores of Gods.  No matter the number of Gods a religion recognizes, a supreme God rules over subordinate Gods in a divine hierarchy. 

The author’s background is Christianity, and that perspective augments this study when appropriate.  However, the focus and intention of the study is to provide information and direction that assists the reader/disciple with doubts on God and religion.  Specific religions and denominations, for the purposes here, are not detailed as they attack and fight one another over nonsensical details – important to the religion’s adherents and beliefs, solely.  Furthermore, every religion proclaims they are the one, and only, True version of religion.  They also make inferences that sum to threaten the eternal outcome of anyone who does not practice their peculiar religion.  The requirements and standards of exclusion bound to a particular belief set, compound the troubles experienced by the Moral Disciple in finding a rational and credible solution to the spiritual doubts they hold. 

Many agnostics and doubters are created by the secular society they inhabit.  The vitriolic and malicious treatment certain secular groups and organizations display towards religion, and people of religion, intimidates belief in God and the practice of religion.  They additionally work to remove worship, and actually seek the eradication of religion from the society.  The modern Moral Disciple requires durable and veracious secular evidence that competes with the secular views advanced in the society, to comfortably embrace belief in God and worship.  Otherwise, the disciple shuns his own beliefs to avoid confrontations he is unable to argue coherently.  Providing useful information, a novel concept or interpretation, and presenting material(s) and locations of resources that help resolve questions, piques an interest in God.  The information also acts to motivate the disciple to expand their efforts and actively explore the God topic to an eventual resolution for their unique needs.  The objectives of the study includes providing that information. 

For the record, my background is Mormonism.  However, I do not exclusively use or rely upon Mormon doctrine.  Many other scriptures, and Aprocrypha, helped me resolve my conflicts with God.  They enlarged my intellect on God and his designs and desires for mankind.  Admittedly, I did not investigate religions other than Christianity past a cursory review.  Since I lack sufficient time in my life to develop a competency in those theologies, they are not referenced or depicted - nor are they dismissed.  Goodness and righteous behaviors are not exclusively limited to Christianity – in my view.  Some form of the Big Ten commandments is found in all religions and metaphysical philosophies.

My belief in plural Gods was obtained from: The Book of Enoch, Pearl of Great Price, certain Biblical translations, Septuagint and other Christian scriptures.  Those volumes reference the “Gods” (plural) when describing the earth’s creation.  They additionally infer a plurality of Gods elsewhere in those texts.  The tower of Babel is another well know occasion were duality of Gods is inferred.
And then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth.”
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”

The references to plural, more than one, the word Gods appears in several locations and scriptural references.  The Godhead infers several members, or beings.  Christianity describes a Trinity – God, Christ, and Holy Spirit.  Depending upon interpretation, this infers at least three divine beings, two with physical bodies and direct authority over man; the third is a spiritual emissary for the preeminent beings.  This may explain the pluralities in scriptures - or not. I believe in a hierarchy of Gods and each God operates solar system, galaxy, or universe.  Their domains are not detailed.  Accurately knowing how many potential Gods exists is problematic.  Other beings inhabit the celestial kingdoms.  Are they considered God’s in that environment?

The Heavenly realm described in Christian scripture, is a perfected environment, populated with auxiliary beings and energy sources.  Angels, for example, are spiritual beings with many Godly powers.  Some angels hold significant authority and responsibilities – the Archangel Michael is exemplary.  God did not detail everyone or entity that worked with him creating the earth and universe.  Speculation limits understanding the divine relationships and hierarchies.  Of interest, the hierarchy rubric infers a potential for individual eternal advancement - future estates to which man may ascend.  Comparing the God and Christ relationship – Father and Son, superior v. subordinate, within the framework given mankind to negotiate this earthly existence; the “progression potential” for human beings who successfully manage their physical, or ‘earthly”, probation is accordingly high.  A person who obeys God’s directions and commandments has the promise of eternal life and any progression therein. This suggests man may be eligible to realize future estates within a Godly hierarchy.  This interpretation, or precept, satisfies the rationality threshold.  It also follows the framework established in the eternal realm, and for man on earth.

“As man is God once was. As God is man may become.”

Is a revelation that defines my relationship with the Almighty.  Scripture defines God as an omnipotent, cogent, eternal, emotional, and orderly being.  Scripture states man was created in God’s image.  Notably, a significant (and largely overlooked) aspect of God’s persona is the scope and intensity of God’s emotions.  God’s emotions are described and depicted ubiquitously in scripture.  At times, it appears these emotions move God to consider acting for, and against, mankind; contingent upon man’s adherence to commandments and displays of affection towards God.  Many scripture describe God’s emotional state and detail his plans if man fails to congregate his feces, correct his thinking, worship, and other behaviors. 

God’s emotional state is alleged predicated upon contextual preconditions.  That causality structure does not eliminate, nor palliate the scope, or intensity of God’s emotions.  References to God’s emotions at the breaking point litter the scriptures – Christ too.  A majority of the time, God is angry – owed to man’s natural inclinations to indulge temporal desires.  Unspecific timelines are inferred; deadlines for compliance.  Once the timelines are breeched, God will act in ways to punish mankind, or individual men.  There are likely cause and effect relationships that construct the timelines, or vice-versa.  The secular psychologist would assert God has anger management issues.

Jesus Christ’s famous emotional outburst – braiding a lash and attacking the moneylenders in the temple – is an example showing Christ is his Father’s son.  Christ is more often recognized for his exceeding love and compassion.  Those references are purposeful and provide comfort.  They suggest an affinity and divine linkage: God, Christ, mankind, and this earthly existence.  There are more references that confirm the relationships.  The Ten Commandments, in particular, reads like a “what NOT to do” list of requirements.  Why did God choose these?  Did God mandate these rules because he learned the negative outcomes from adverse, personal experiences?

Some religious people may find this interpretation and inference heretical; at least disrespectful.  They are not.  The interpretations are reasoned and deductive conclusions drawn from glaringly obvious, and copious scriptural references.  The sources are the scriptures presented to man from God for reference.  They are our Father’s admonitions.  He wanted the examples included in scriptures to inform man of the commonalities shared and the challenges arising from them. 

We are God’s offspring.  God is our Dad.  He precisely knows from experience the challenges earthly life presents.  God once inhabited a physical body like man’s.  All learning comes from experience.  Only faith is removed from tangible, sensory experiences.  Faith, in my opinion, is the one divine aspect of life God expects man to master.  Much is written on the immense power of faith.  The ability to control matter is the most significant one.  God uses faith to act in a Godly, omnipotent and omniscient manner.  Faith provides God all of his majestic abilities.  The relationship between a perfect faith, or Will, and controlling the physical matter in the universe, helps explain “WHY”.  Free Will is an indispensible component of earthly life.  Love is another emotion that directs our heavenly Father’s actions and plans for us.  God’s commandments are literally the directions provided from a concerned parent to his offspring.

Because the path of eternal progression requires God be an absent parent, he relentlessly commands man to worship (love) him.  Three of the Ten Commandments describe where, when, and how, to worship, or love God.  God’s focus on the worship parameters can be interpreted as signs of a lonesome, loving Father who yearns for interaction and contact with his offspring.  He wants the best outcomes for his children and worship provides the opportunity to interact with, and assist, his children – and himself.  This concept is significantly important considering the dynamics of the relationship. The scriptural references describing God’s emotions and the behaviors targeted in the commandments provide insight.  These combine, from my perspective, to provide abundant evidence that strongly suggests God once assumed a physical body - replete with emotions and internal conflicts – like man.  The scriptures also align with a practical evaluation of the purpose for human life, and expand the meaning for eternal grace.  If God was able to overcome his physical weaknesses - temptations of the flesh, and persistently accrue intelligence to dedicate himself to a divine mission; so may man.  The scriptures read more in support of this causality conclusion, than the interpretation that clinically separates man and God into: creator – creation; master – servant, or another emotionless and sanitary relationship.  The familial relationship is largely shaped by the same emotional content and objectives man shares with God.  God retains a physical body equipped with the emotional components apparently requisite in physicality in his exalted, eternal state.                                            

The following is my favorite scripture inspired the Sentience Thesis:
“Whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the resurrection.  And if a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come.”
“There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated, and when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated.
The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man’s; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us.
 A man may receive the Holy Ghost, and it may descend upon him and not tarry with him.”

The retention, transfer, and advantages - gained from acquiring and applying the information and intellect gleaned from earthly experiences in the afterlife, is promised.  The likelihood for the relationship dynamics constructed by men on earth, following God’s commandments, God’s design, for specific emotional and practical objectives existing in the afterlife, is high.  Scripture records God’s promise of permitting the retention of intellect, and the practical advantages, contained in acquiring a superior intellect, while residing in an earthly state.  Concluding the structure and content of earthly relationships, and advantages in a learned intellect are eternal precepts, satisfies the standards of reason, and logic, evident in scriptural records depicting God’s design, and his eternal requirements for order and continuity.

What is the point of eternal life if there is no opportunity for intellectual and inter-personal progression?  If the extension of a soul’s duration, eternity, is acknowledged; to what end?  If the opportunity for a soul’s divine progression is eliminated – what remains of value within the after-life context depicted?  The answer to these questions appears removed from man’s purview; as they preclude the physical dilemma man must surmount to be eligible for eternal grace.  They are not.  There are physical components, energies, and properties associated with God’s earthly and eternal designs for grace.  The human soul has a physical composition.  Each thought and behavior chosen, and outcomes precipitated, have corresponding physical properties - mass and energy. God evaluates each soul for eternal eligibility, he will interpret these components as they pertain to a specific eternal destination.  Interaction with an environment, and earthly experiences, accrue, rearrange, and amplify, the physical matter and energy within the soul. 

God’s commandments and directions are the instructions for attaining eternal eligibility.  The soul must contain specific physical content.  Each soul must acquire the requisite matter and energy, and have that content properly arranged, to enable and sustain an eternal transition and survive the new environment. The earthly existence was designed to provide each soul an opportunity to acquire and display their determination and faith potential by properly employing the Free Will given them.  The soul’s content, derived from earthly experiences; the behaviors and deliberations chosen, reveals the soul’s ability, and willingness, to persevere in the absence of empirical evidence, the objectives sought, grace and eternal life, are real.  Faith produces essential components required to achieve, and sustain, a state of eternal grace.

God endowed man with Free Will.  Free will and personal freedoms are adorned with risks and perpetually confront resistance from antagonists seeking to claim those freedoms and assume control over the individual.  Personal freedom is a tightrope walk without a net.  Risk, RE: Uncertainty, (and the risks uncertainty creates) is the price of freedom.  Free Will, defined, is the unrestrained, unconditional opportunity for man to defy the entity providing the Free will.  Free Will has a significant unrighteous potential.  It was specifically introduced to verify a man’s obedience – his willingness to properly employ the Free Will afforded him.

Controlling Free Will, obeying commandments, is the “object of the exercise in this earthly life. 

Actualizing self-control over Free Will – mastering the commandments, in combination with faith and a genuine, and timely, display of affection towards our Deity Dad are the totality of divine expectations.  That’s it!  These conditions articulate the pathway to obtain an eternal life and secure the intellectual and spiritual opportunities available for use in that domain.  Making these choices require a belief in unverifiable truths, intangible concepts, and the adjacent uncertain realities they create.  Faith is the word adopted to describe those efforts.

Many forces, external and internal, chemical compounds, and energies imperil eternal ambitions. They make the exercise much more difficult than needs be.  Each man must learn, experience, consider, and choose to develop and exercise faith.  God provides benchmarks and rewards in the form of blessings – temporal and eternal - to encourage the Moral Disciple.  As the scripture indicates, each blessing is a reward for proper behaviors – following a specific commandment / blessing matrix.  That relationship and promise are eternal and predates man on earth – “There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven, before the foundations of this world...  This is an eternal paradigm. 

It may be argued decision taking would change radically if people could recall experiences from the pre-existence.  Unfortunately, no one, not even Christ is permitted that knowledge while alive.